rsedis VS trust-dns

Compare rsedis vs trust-dns and see what are their differences.


Redis re-implemented in Rust. (by seppo0010)
Our great sponsors
  • SonarQube - Static code analysis for 29 languages.
  • InfluxDB - Access the most powerful time series database as a service
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
rsedis trust-dns
1 11
1,636 2,778
- -
0.0 9.6
over 2 years ago 8 days ago
Rust Rust
BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of rsedis. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-17.


Posts with mentions or reviews of trust-dns. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-11.
  • What would you rewrite in Rust?
    44 projects | | 11 Feb 2023
    You might be interested in Trust DNS - "A Rust based DNS client, server, and Resolver, built to be safe and secure from the ground up."
  • Announcing `async-dns`
    4 projects | | 22 Sep 2022
    It looks like you need to reach for a separate crate for that:
    4 projects | | 22 Sep 2022
    This is not true; you can use the async resolver with other executors:
  • Innernet: Open source Rust based Tailscale alternative by Tonari
    6 projects | | 29 Mar 2021
    You could run a local DNS server using something like . Or, you could install an NSS module to resolve names via the innernet client.
  • single-producer single-consumer concurrent queue
    5 projects | | 29 Mar 2021
    My point is that "implementation that doesn't use unsafe" is not necessarily always slower than "implementation that does use unsafe". Often people assume that this is the case, and it isn't. tinyvec currently beats smallvec in more than a few benchmarks. Not all, but some. And this sometimes visible to users. The point is that if you want speed, you don't necessarily need to give up any safety at all. Most differences in performance are due to the amount of effort or expertise that has been spent on the codebase, not the amount of unsafe in it.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rsedis and trust-dns you can also consider the following projects:

parity-bitcoin - The Parity Bitcoin client

citybound - A work-in-progress, open-source, multi-player city simulation game.

flowgger - A fast data collector in Rust

woodpecker - Drill is an HTTP load testing application written in Rust


tauri - Build smaller, faster, and more secure desktop applications with a web frontend.

Way Cooler

imag - imag - Text based personal information management suite

Servo - The Servo Browser Engine

tokei - Count your code, quickly.

sokoban-rs - An implementation of Sokoban in Rust

tv-renamer - Mirror of