roxy-wi VS kubebox

I stumbled across roxy-wi (https://roxy-wi.org), but it is quite off putting, when all the quick installations are locked behind a pay wall. All I want to do is just spin up a Docker container and see if it would work in my enviroment. Does anyone have other suggestions or do I have to stick to handling HAProxy via cli? :)

Our website: https://roxy-wi.org/

Project repository (you can not only express your opinion, but also send pull requests)

https://roxy-wi.org/ - the official website of the project (here is the documentation);

https://github.com/hap-wi/roxy-wi - official project repository.

To anyone visiting here, I got a lot of feedback for new tools (which I haven't tried yet), both on Youtube and here, so I compiled it into a list: A comment on Lens: Initially I wanted to include Lens in the video but decided it's a bit different in that it's not a CLI / TUI. Many users shared bad experience with Lens, mainly around performance and a large amount of requests it shoots at the cluster API to a point where some companies banned it. These are the tools (I may add a video review on if anyone thinks it's worth it): * https://github.com/kubermatic/fubectl - for an improved kubectl experience * https://github.com/particledecay/kconf - for those with complex kubeconfig changes requirements * https://github.com/MuhammedKalkan/OpenLens - an open version of Lens (note the above before using) * https://github.com/hidetatz/kubecolor - colored kubectl output :) * https://github.com/astefanutti/kubebox - the K9s little brother? * https://github.com/bergerx/kubectl-status - human friendly resource status output

If that later becomes problematic, maybe I'll switch to https://github.com/astefanutti/kubebox