Rust Language Server
artifact
Our great sponsors
| Rust Language Server | artifact | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | - | |
| 3,568 | 565 | |
| - | - | |
| 7.0 | 0.0 | |
| over 1 year ago | over 3 years ago | |
| Rust | Rust | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Rust Language Server
-
Why doesn't rust-analyzer reuse infrastructures of rustc?
In the last there was RLS that did exactly that. But the approach of rust-analyzer was found to be more performant.
-
[RFC] Generate Cabal files from TOML
LSP support seems to be lacking as well, at least rust doesn't seem to have Cargo.toml support? https://github.com/rust-lang/rls/issues/785
-
Referencing files in subfolders and difference between borrowing and C like references
apparently, it means that you're using the old RLS-based Rust plugin for VS Code, rather than the rust-analyzer plugin. You probably won't see a lot of people familiar with RLS's error messages.
-
friendly reminder for our vscode folks, use rust-analyzer
Why: The rust-analyzer extension integrates with rust-analyzer, an alternative language server for Rust. rust-analyzer tends to perform better and get less confused with your code as compared to RLS, which the Rust extension uses.
-
Show HN: Skruv – No-dependency, no-build, small JavaScript framework
I have tried writing websites with rust instead of JavaScript. Unfortunately, the tooling is just not there. More specifically, I am talking about wasm-bindgen, which provides two-way bindings. The problem with it is that since all the declarations are generated with build.rs, there is no autocompletion. Since I am spoiled by modern tooling, no autocompletion to me means not feasible pass demo stage. (https://github.com/rust-lang/rls/issues/1489)
Aside from the lack of autocompletion, passing rust closures to js land (DOM) is extremely janky as well. However, that might be caused by my lack of experience with rust.
(If you are curious, this is what I made: https://github.com/SCLeoX/non-grid-path-finder)
-
José Valim The Creator Of The Elixir Programming
Python the core devs don't care about tooling and they have IDE's, Java is an enterprise monolith so IDE's are the standard, Rust yes it is (https://github.com/rust-lang/rls), Elm I have no idea I don't use it.
artifact
We haven't tracked posts mentioning artifact yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
What are some alternatives?
Rustup - The Rust toolchain installer
rustfix - Automatically apply the suggestions made by rustc
Racer - Rust Code Completion utility
rustfmt - Format Rust code
rusty-tags - Create ctags/etags for a cargo project
Clippy - A bunch of lints to catch common mistakes and improve your Rust code. Book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/clippy/
rust-analyzer - A Rust compiler front-end for IDEs
just - 🤖 Just a command runner
semantic-rs
quickcheck - Automated property based testing for Rust (with shrinking).
rFmt