rez VS virtualenv

What alternatives are there to rez?

To sum up the previous post, I currently use and like (rez)[https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/rez], but I am wondering if there is something better out there with the same idea of rez, i.e.

I am looking for a quick and easy to use tool to manage version control of different packages. Mainly on Linux but multi platform support would be great. I have found and used rez and I quite like it. I find it lightweight and I only barely need to use it if I wanted to, i.e. I could link to all the packages installed locally by myself. However, if there is something out there that is more widely adopted and would have lifetime support then I would prefer to use that.

Great stuff! Will check it out. https://github.com/nerdvegas/rez

It's mainly for the purpose of taking these RPMs and converting them to a slightly different package manager (rez). Ideally, any found solution would be able to work with older versions as a result. Though I'm learning online that yum, yumdownloader, and other tools seem to restrict output based on data about the user's host OS

Take a look into rez

For more information visit: virtualenv documentation.

Python's venv module is officially recommended for creating virtual environments since Python 3.5 comes packaged with your Python installation. While there still are additional older tools available, such as conda and virtualenv, if you are new to virtual environments, it is best to use venv now.

Despite these attractive attributes, many developers I've come across don't prefer Fish shell, primarily due to integration gaps with tools like Python's virtualenv. So, in this article, I'm offering a simple solution for automatic virtualenv activation for Fish shell, steering clear of resource-intensive frameworks like oh-my-fish that often slow down the shell.

`virtualenv` still exists and is still actively developed. It's true that Python 3 ships with `venv` but I think `virtualenv` offers some additional features.

https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv

virtualenv is a tool that creates an isolated Python environment for each of your projects.

Python is the chosen language for this tutorial and as you can guess some precautions should be done to make sure that the environment is setup correctly and the main OS I'll use is Ubuntu(a Linux distro) virtual environment is a tool that helps you to isolate your code from the rest of the system. It is a good idea to create a virtual environment for your project.

$ curl -O https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/raw/master/virtualenv.py$ python virtualenv.py my_new_env$ . my_new_env/bin/activate(my_new_env)$ pip install ... Or something entirely different?

I've been using Fish for years and spend my entire day working with Python. Python's virtualenv has an `activate.fish` command, I've never had any problems with it. Additionally, we have a ton of internal tooling built in a fabfile, so I've written a couple of snippets of fish that automatically activate that .venv (Poetry managed) whenever I cd into a directory that has one, and also expands a bunch of env vars into the shell session. I've also got this feature request in on the virtualenv repo in the hope that one day we can have activate.fish emit an event - https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/issues/1456

We of cause, like all good developers do, put the error message online and look for clues, we quickly found a GitHub issue and boi, we are not the only souls that got crushed by a "timely" release of virtualenv just a few hours before us. Since the lastest version of virtualenv got installed every time we create the CI build job on Travis, it fails even we have done nothing. Of cause we didn't point fingers at other maintainers, they are just as hardworking as us and it's human to make mistakes. We are faced with 2 options, roll back to the previous release or wait for the patch of virtualenv to get released. As the devs of virtualenv did a lighting fast patch, we have chosen option 2.