restassured-complete-basic-example VS Java Faker

In the restassured-complete-basic-example project, you can find the Simulation model, which models the request and response for the Simulations API.

The restassured-complete-basic-example project has a factory data class to generate all the necessary data in different conditions. It’s a good real-world example.

The configuration file

In some cases, you can even call some existing endpoints to provide data you need to use in your tests. It’s the case for the method getAllSimulationsFromApi() where I’m getting the existing simulation, using it in the oneExistingSimulation() factory method to get a random existing simulation and on allExistingSimulations() to return all the existing simulations.

Faker was originally written in Perl and is also available as a library for Ruby, Java, and Python.

you can use faker java

JavaFaker for generating random data https://github.com/DiUS/java-faker

I've been using https://github.com/DiUS/java-faker which seems to be much more popular. How is this one different?

I'm using 1.0.2 from this repository: https://github.com/DiUS/java-faker

I'm Java developer. While we have had our fair share of shenanigans, if the people behind the Java equivalent of faker (https://github.com/DiUS/java-faker) went off the rails it wouldn't be anywhere near as much of an issue.

This has another bottleneck, each time you request something, it ends up with a IO call to open a file, as all fake data is stored in a file: https://github.com/datafaker-net/datafaker/blob/master/src/main/resources/en/dragon_ball.yml I recently filed a bug to javafaker that in some cases file descriptor was never closed, resulting in even worse performance and memory leaks, killing our service after millions of method calls.