replxx
awesome-hpp
Our great sponsors
replxx | awesome-hpp | |
---|---|---|
6 | 6 | |
667 | 3,168 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 6.2 | |
5 days ago | 4 months ago | |
C++ | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | The Unlicense |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
replxx
-
A C++ commandline for use in servers and chat software. Provides very simple asynchronous input/output.
2) Why not replxx? It is BSD licensed.
- Replxx 0.0.4 is out: a C++, GNU readline and BSD libedit replacement library
- replxx 0.0.4 is out: GNU readline and BSD libedit replacement library with modern feature set
-
DumboCpp - Declare C++ functions and invoke them via command line interface
This function is then accessible via a CLI provided with the help of replxx. Parameters are checked for correct type and count.
-
Is C++ Still Worth Learning? Absolutely! Yes Rust And Go Are Awesome. There Is Still Work To Be Done In C++
oldschool text adventure (with linenoise or replxx)
-
C++ "commandline" library for use in servers and terminal chat programs
There is already replxx which has everything you mention and more.
awesome-hpp
-
Collecting the best C++ practices
awesome-hpp. A curated list of awesome header-only C++ libraries.
-
oof: real-time, full-color console output for C++
I sampled ten arbitrary projects from https://github.com/p-ranav/awesome-hpp, and not one of them used this pattern. Maybe it's more common in some circles than others?
-
Is C++ Still Worth Learning? Absolutely! Yes Rust And Go Are Awesome. There Is Still Work To Be Done In C++
If package managers seem intimidating, try header-only libraries that require no compilation or configuration.
- A curated list of header-only C++ libraries
-
Why is it preferred to declare functions in header files but not define them?
That doesn't mean there aren't any header-only libraries. Usually small libraries implement everything in a header file. Checkout this GitHub link. With such header-only-libraries, all you have to do is include the header, write code which uses them, compile and you are done. This also doesn't involve the headache of setting up complicated build systems.
-
CXXGraph Library
awesome-hpp
What are some alternatives?
linenoise - A small self-contained alternative to readline and libedit
mp-units - The quantities and units library for C++
tiny-utf8 - Unicode (UTF-8) capable std::string
eos - A lightweight 3D Morphable Face Model library in modern C++
Lingo - Text encoding for modern C++
CXXGraph - Header-Only C++ Library for Graph Representation and Algorithms
nuspell - 🖋️ Fast and safe spellchecking C++ library
cppbestpractices - Collaborative Collection of C++ Best Practices. This online resource is part of Jason Turner's collection of C++ Best Practices resources. See README.md for more information.
Vcpkg - C++ Library Manager for Windows, Linux, and MacOS
tinyobjloader - Tiny but powerful single file wavefront obj loader
pixel - Simple 2D Graphics based on standard and portable OpenGL