remult
proposal-decorators
Our great sponsors
remult | proposal-decorators | |
---|---|---|
37 | 64 | |
2,682 | 2,643 | |
7.2% | 1.1% | |
9.8 | 4.2 | |
7 days ago | about 2 months ago | |
TypeScript | ||
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
remult
-
Remult.dev OSS backend to frontend framework
I really enjoyed reading this post from the creator of a new fullstack OSS framework called remult.dev which I think is super useful.
-
Introducing Remult: The Open Source Backend to Frontend Framework You Always Wanted
Check out Remult, and if you like it, give it a star. Let us know what you’d like to see next, and also feel free to contribute to the project.
- Remult : Fullstack typesafe CRUD framework adds zero-boilerplate live queries
- Remult: Fullstack typesafe CRUD framework adds zero-boilerplate live queries
-
Show HN: Fullstack typesafe CRUD framework adds zero-boilerplate live queries
Hey everyone,
Remult is a full-stack CRUD framework that uses your TypeScript entities as a single source of truth for your API, frontend type-safe API client, and backend ORM.
https://github.com/remult/remult
In this version 0.18 we launched a new core feature - real-time live queries. Using this feature any data fetching done with Remult can easily turn into a live-query subscription that listens to backend changes on its result set and updates the frontend state accordingly.
Any feedback/suggestions would be appreciated.
- Yoni
-
Building a Full-stack Application with TypeScript and React Using Remult
Now that you’ve learned about Remult, how would you use it in your next project? To learn more about Remult, check out the official documentation.
- Anyone tried Remult yet? What's your experience with it?
-
Are there Internal tools builders made for devs ? (Meaning not full no code)
I can suggest Remult which is "all-code" but handles most of the CRUD for you while you have complete control over the frontend and backend for more complex stuff...
-
Remult: Build a type-safe, full-stack app with TypeScript
Simple CRUD-based modules, a common requirement of any business, should be simple to build and maintain. Remult is a comprehensive framework that allows developers to build full-stack, type-safe apps using only TypeScript code.
proposal-decorators
-
Making Web Component properties behave closer to the platform
Because many rules are common to many attributes (the coerceType operation is defined by WebIDL, or using similar rules, and the HTML specification defines a handful of microsyntaxes for the parseValue and stringifyValue operations), those could be packaged up in a helper library. And with decorators coming to ECMAScript (and already available in TypeScript), those could be greatly simplified:
-
The case for using decorators in your codebase
Decorators are currently not a part of the standard JavaScript language. They are still being discussed in tc39 and have reached proposal stage 3. This means the spec has more or less stabilized and we can use them but they would be transplied before being run in the browser. This would be done via babel or tsc for most users
-
JavaScript Naming Conventions are Important
JavaScript was created a long time ago, and at the time of its inception, the authors decided not to use affirmative prefixes for boolean names. Now, they do their best by continuing to follow their convention, even if it goes against the community's opinion. Even if the authors wanted to introduce new naming conventions in the specification, they could not do it, at least not coherently. Old code cannot be renamed because JavaScript must remain backward-compatible. And starting to write new code using new approaches is not a great idea either, as there would be two ways to do the same thing, which is also undesirable.
-
ECMAScript Decorators. The Ones That are Real
2016-07 – Stage 2. After the decorators proposal reached stage 2, its API began to undergo significant changes. Furthermore, at one point the proposal was referred to as "ESnext class features for JavaScript." During its development, there were numerous ideas about how decorators could be structured. To get a comprehensive view of the entire history of changes, I recommend reviewing the commits in the proposal's repository. Here is an example of what the decorators API used to look like:
-
Strawberry - Zero-Dependency, Build-Free JavaScript Framework
The example you've given isn't valid JavaScript, JS doesn't have decorators. (Although there is a stage 3 tc39 for it, afaik no browser has implemented it)
-
Updates from the 96th TC39 meeting
There was a decorators issue brought up in the meeting (issue 508) and decorators metadata, as noted in the article, is now at stage 3. So there's still active work being done on decorators. If I had to guess, I'd say they'd be a likely candidate for ES2024.
-
The Lightweight Alternative to GraphQL, Resolvers Instead of Endpoints
As per the proposal, decorators can be used with Classes and their elements such as fields, methods, and accessors. To leverage this feature, we need to ensure that our resolvers provider is an instance of a Class. Therefore, we will modify the code in src/api/users/users-resolvers.js to the following:
-
Using modern decorators in TypeScript
The modern version of decorators, which will be officially rolled out in TypeScript 5.0, no longer requires a compiler flag and follows the official ECMAScript Stage-3 proposal. Alongside a stable implementation that follows ECMAScript standards, decorators now work seamlessly with the TypeScript type system, enabling more enhanced functionality than the original version.
-
What should I do after react js
100% this. Going in depth of libraries will make you so much better developer than learning newest and coolest frameworks in JS ecosystem. Learn to create your own React, Promises, or anything you like in JS. It will give you immense perspective about these libraries. Once you start understanding them you will feel like they are not that complex and you can do it too. Go read TC39 proposals and issues people point out in them. You will see how JS is borrowing features from other languages.
-
Announcing TypeScript 5.0
The actual proposal gives the "@reactive" decorator as the first example, which just so happens is the only decorator that I use in my library with TypeScript's legacy decorator option. Was so happy to see they recognize this use case! https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators
What are some alternatives?
Prisma - Next-generation ORM for Node.js & TypeScript | PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB and CockroachDB
TypeORM - ORM for TypeScript and JavaScript. Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Server, Oracle, SAP Hana, WebSQL databases. Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron platforms.
nestjs-auth - Comprehensive handling of authentication and authorization for NestJS.
proposal-decorator-metadata
openapi-typescript - Generate TypeScript types from OpenAPI 3 specs
proposals - Tracking ECMAScript Proposals
LoopBack - LoopBack makes it easy to build modern applications that require complex integrations.
arktype - TypeScript's 1:1 validator, optimized from editor to runtime
fresh - The next-gen web framework.
loopback-next - LoopBack makes it easy to build modern API applications that require complex integrations.
reflex-metadata-SCKS