redux-persist VS karma

Storage: redux-persist, @react-native-async-storage/async-storage

Next, following their official document, I added some changes to my store.

redux-persist : For persisting data locally

One thing to keep in mind with persisting data to a device is that you maybe have to run migrations on that data if your app starts to use that data differently. https://github.com/rt2zz/redux-persist/blob/master/docs/migrations.md

for most applications, AsyncStorage works fine. also, you can use it with redux-persist or persist middleware of zustand. in this way, you won't even need to touch the AsyncStorage. my first choice as a database (or just a persistor tool) is zustand and AsyncStorage. this combination can solve storage issues most of the time.

That is also admittedly not very smart. Maybe you only want to persist certain slices, maybe you need to do other things with it. That's why https://github.com/rt2zz/redux-persist and other similar addons exist.

Run ng test to execute the unit tests via Karma.

This is an example for those using Karma:

Karma

While the default Angular starter includes unit tests, it makes use of the older and clunky Karma/Jasmine combo for unit testing.

If Protractor is replacing Angular Scenario Runner for E2E testing, does that mean I will still be able to use it with Karma as my E2E testing framework ?

They are tools for automated testing of websites/webapps: https://karma-runner.github.io https://www.cypress.io

Run ng test to execute the unit tests via Karma.

iii. Integration Testing -Karma

Karma