Muun recovery VS circuitbreaker

Has anybody tested self sovereign recovery with Muun? https://github.com/muun/recovery I am going to attempt it soon, but just wondering how easy and smooth the process is.

Make sure to generate that second backup step thing. Then you can use this https://github.com/muun/recovery

You can download the desktop recovery app. Using your recovery pdf and your recovery code, you can send your holding to a new Bitcoin address. https://github.com/muun/recovery

you can't directly import Muun wallet to Electrum, but you can use Muun Recovery tool https://github.com/muun/recovery and send your bitcoin to your new address in Electrum.

They have a FOSS recovery utility that lets you grab the money from those multisig addresses in case you "lost" your phone/app. It scans the chain using the public Electrum servers and builds a transaction from those addresses to whatever address you provide. So instead of the unspent amount you get the entire amount. It's not possible to find those on-chain addresses in the app so the whole scheme is quite obscure. And since this issue is fundamental because the approach they chose it can't be fixed. Either you can't recover your money at all (and it contradicts their security model) or you recover more than you should (and it's not your fault of course).

Circuit Breaker v0.3.1 (Released: 25th July 2022) - https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker/tags

A lightning 'firewall' to avoid griefing attacks (see Github repo, and Bitcoin Magazine article). Alpha quality so should be as an option, not in main guide yet.

In the case depicted in Fig-2, our routing node is directly connected to the custodial service. This is ideal to optimize the attack: the deposits have no cost, HTLCs will settle quickly, and we avoid the limitations set by other routing nodes using CircuitBreaker (payments fail when a few HTLCs are pending). If the attack is successful, having a lot of inbound liquidity from other nodes is key. The channel to the custodial service will quickly become unusable as we have stolen the liquidity to our side. Therefore, you want to desuturate it by circular rebalancing. Once we free up inbound liquidity from the custodial service, the channels to our liquidity providers will be saturated, we can chose to close those and move the profits on-chain or we could loop out (not sure which process is less costly: we are making free BTC, does it even matter?)

That's old news from last year. Already been addressed: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/4527 https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker

The nano shiller proceeds with more FUD: "Ya but LN has many security issues, there is the famous flood & loot attack, you should google it". What the nano shillers either don't know, or as I would expect from them, consciously omit is that we already have a sort of "firewall" for this attack and this problem has been fixed. I suspect consciously because they always claim bitcoin is not scalable when this is obviously false and they know that too.

Ah ok I misunderstood your question then. The third option is what i use also. For your 4th option take a look at https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker where an hold fee for an htlc was discussed. The base fee part could probably be used as you suggest as fourth option but I do not think something like this is implemented anywhere yet.

1) Flood & Loot attacks have been fixed. Source 1 & Source 2.

And here https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker