react-easy-state VS rfcs

I've really enjoyed react-easy-state

For state, I love to use React Easy State.

react-easy-state was very easy.

If you want to try something a bit different with regards to state management, you can try: https://github.com/RisingStack/react-easy-state

Nope, react-easy-state is much easier: https://github.com/RisingStack/react-easy-state

I personally prefer to work with react-easy-state instead of using Redux or even the built-in state management in React.

Just started using react-easy-state in a project, and I have to say I love it. In the past, I used Redux/RTK for global state management, along with Redux Thunk or Redux Saga for side effects. In contrast, react-easy-state is easy and requires so much less boilerplate to setup and worry about. I’m fully comfortable using Redux in apps and have done it plenty of times, but I love how react-easy-state just works. It’s amazing being able to mutate the state from anywhere, inside and outside of components, and have it immediately reflected by components, without installing any plugins and having complex config files.

I am a big fan of react-easy-state, which uses proxies to automatically trigger re-renders when you mutate any state that the component depends on. It's a bit of a different way of using state management compared to typical immutable state examples, but it allows for some very straightforward code without much boilerplate around it.

The app for people to submit orders (drinks-user) is just a form and to manage state, I'm using React-easy-state

Examples from the conversations of that time:

> ...we want closures to capture the values we rendered with, and to keep "seeing" those values forever. That's really important for concurrent mode where a notion of current value doesn't really exist. Hooks design models a component as being in many non-clashing states at the same time, instead of switching the "current" state (which is what classes model well). People don't really need to think about these details, but they're motivating the design a lot. [0]

> In Concurrent Mode, render may run more then one time, and since this in a class is mutable, renders that should be the same may not be. [1]

[0] - https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/68#issuecomment-4778866...

[1] - https://tkplaceholder.io/why-function-components-fit-react-b...

There are multiple names for this hook. You can find the documentation under the names useEvent or useEffectEvent.

-https://www.patterns.dev/ -https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/blob/main/text/0188-server-components.md -https://dev.to/this-is-learning/qwik-the-post-modern-framework-3c5o -https://dev.to/this-is-learning/astro-framework-169m -https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2019/02/rendering-on-the-web -https://web.dev/vitals/

However, in React, function components can return a ReactNode. This type includes number | string | Iterable | undefined and will likely also include Promise( in the future.

I was also hoping that useEvent would eliminate some weird dependency cases, who knows when that will actually happen (https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/220).

Given a lot of unknowns on SSR and ReactEng working on RSC it feels like the wrong move to use next.js and I should just use normal react. For basic react is create react app the way to go or vite?

As mentioned before, Next.js takes a stance of treating every component as a Server Component by default. If you want to use a Client Component, you'll need to annotate the file with use client; directive at the top of the component file.

Use client is actually a React convention for what it’s worth. https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/227