raylib VS SDL2

Let's take a look at another API. Raylib. Now Raylib does a little bit more than just load images. Raylib is more of a game framework than a single-purpose library. It will create a window, handle input, load images, render pixels, handle loading and rendering fonts, and so on. Even though Raylib does multiple things, it doesn't go overboard. It tries to be simple yet robust. There's a clear vision for the library. They didn't try to force a GUI editor into the API or an alternative string type. It had one goal and that is to become a game framework. What happens when Raylib has added all the features it needs to add? Well, call it feature-complete and just move on. There's no need to bloat an API for no reason other than you "felt like it".

Don't like having to use gigantic game engines to make games? Here's a whole suite of beautifully simple libraries with bindings for a lot of languages: raylib

Do like playing video games? I know I do; in fact, I enjoy it so much that I learned how to make video games. So, for a recent course I’m taking in school for open-source development I decided to focus on Raylib. Raylib describes itself as “a simple and easy-to-use library to enjoy videogames programming.” Written in pure c with bindings for almost any other programming language such as c++, Rust, and Python. It is a flexible tool which can work in almost any environment.

Fetch Packages... raylib... ./ray_test_zig/build.zig.zon:7:20: error: url field is missing corresponding hash field .url = "https://github.com/raysan5/raylib/archive/refs/tags/5.0.tar.gz", ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ note: expected .hash = "1220c28847ca8e8756734ae84355802b764c9d9cf4de057dbc6fc2b15c56e726f27b",

libGDX is great, but I can understand if it's not for some people. This also applies to love2d, raylib and Monogame

Raylib library

The link is provided here: SDL2 perl module