raygun4android VS Polly

Raygun is a cloud-based platform that makes sure your web and mobile applications are free of errors, as well as your users are satisfied. It specializes in JavaScript error monitoring and offers a wide range of features to help you easily detect and fix issues.

We can make the process a little easier by using our agile processes together with a continuous deployment strategy. For example, our friends at Raygun, discovered that “when a team gets locked into a sprint it can become much harder to recognize and fix bugs”.

Regarding your last question, when I mention sub-processors who we don't have an SCC with I'm thinking about vendors like RayGun. It's a system we use to monitor alerts and warnings coming from our app when in the hands of our end-users. We have configured the tool so we get absolutely no personal information - no names, emails, id's or any of that sort. It's nothing more than technical data dumps from the inner workings of our app.

Error logging and monitoring are crucial for any application, Appwrite being no exception. We wanted to make it extremely easy to collect and monitor your logs while staying true to our philosophy of being completely platform agnostic. With Appwrite 0.12, we've introduced support for some amazing open source logging providers like Sentry, Raygun and AppSignal!

We have RayGun for logging/reporting on the client-side of the apps. They are showing nothing interesting from those devices. They seem to fail silently.

Raygun

In our applications, we should wrap all requests to remote services in code that implements a retry policy that follows one of the strategies I listed earlier. If you are a .NET developer like myself, you may be familiar with the Polly library. Golang has a library called Retry, and there are numerous third-party libraries for Python and Java.

Another question that rises is, would it be better to use some HttpClient package to handle the requests, like Refit in combination with Polly. But then again, it seems Refit also uses the HttpClient factory, which was a bad thing according to the previous?

D'Oh! Sorry, not PolySharp. I meant Polly. Too many similarly-named libraries!

Everywhere I've worked with AGs, we've worked with the application team to add retry logic to help make things a bit more seamless to end users. There are libraries out there that can make this pretty easy - Polly is one that I've used a few times, but there are others.

Fallacy 1: The network is reliable. If system 2 works perfectly well, but is not accessible for service 1 due to network issues, service 2 is still unavailable. This is why timeouts, service breakers and retry policies exist. A great tool for .NET to handle common network issues is Polly, but even when using a tool like this, the network is still not completely reliable.

I see. Then I don't have any better idea right now, but I do want to suggest that if your script is mostly API calls and you want to be able to deal with failures then take a look at the polly library: https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly

Runs in containers nicely, has good integration with Kafka, RabbitMQ, gRPC, etc. for Microservices communication. Implements resiliency patterns you'd want in Microservices via Polly. Has a decent Dependency Injection framework built in by default.

It's in no way hidden. But I use Polly all the time.

Depending if the sender or the reciever is down, you can also try Polly http://www.thepollyproject.org/