range-v3 VS CppCoreGuidelines

std::ranges is in c++20, but you can pull in the library it was based on if you use 17 (https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3)

What you are describing seems to be std::ranges. If you’re interested in understanding how to implement it, I recommend checking out the original reference implementation, rangev3. Trying to implement your own ranges framework is really good practice for learning how to do efficient, advanced generic programming in C++. I highly recommend it as a hobby learning project. But it’s also really, really hard to do correctly, so please just use the stdlib and/or rangev3 in any real project.

In C++23, there will be std::views::cartesian_product. It is already available in the range-v3 library, the one that the standard is based on.

/** * @brief Forwards value equivalent to the std::forward. * * Using cast instead of std::forward to avoid template instantiation. Used by * Eric Niebler in range library. * * @see https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3 */

It uses a custom zip_iterator (which isn't very good, and you should really use the one from boost or from range-v3).

It contains very little functionality compared to the Eric Niebler’s reference implementation for my liking. Especially views. This will undoubtedly change in the future. But the point is moot, because they are not really supported the is no other option for now other than https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3.

range-v3 is a great library allowing you to bridge the gap: https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3

[range-v3](https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3) which std::ranges was based on has the `to>()` which as far as I know is expected to get into c++23 :)

You need to talk to Bjarne and Herb...

"C++ Core Guidelines" - https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines

In addition to the other comments -

TypeScript deliberately takes a "good enough" approach to improving JavaScript, instead of designing an ideal but incompatible approach. For example, its handling of [function parameter bivariance](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/type-compatibil...) is unsound but works much better with the existing JavaScript ecosystem. By contrast, a more academic functional programming language would guarantee a sound type system but would be a huge shift from JavaScript.

By analogy, Herb Sutter is arguing that something like the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines), with tooling help in this new Cpp2 syntax, can bring real improvements to safety. Something like Rust's borrow checker would bring much stricter guarantees, backed by academic research and careful design, but would be incompatible and a huge adjustment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2olsGf6JIkU

Take a look at Effective Modern c++ by Scott Meyers and the ISO c++ core guidelines. These resources are great for learning how to write better, more modern C++. I don't think it would be hard to grasp if you're already familiar with the language, just make sure to actually write some code which makes use of this stuff, otherwise it's easy to forget.

Look to the C++ Core Guidelines. It's not perfect, it has some flaws, including some sabotaging advice apparently adopted for political reasons. But at least it has some C++ authorities (Bjarne and Herb) as authors.