rails_best_practices
a code metric tool for rails projects (by flyerhzm)
Rubycritic
A Ruby code quality reporter (by whitesmith)
rails_best_practices | Rubycritic | |
---|---|---|
1 | 4 | |
4,173 | 3,405 | |
0.0% | 0.3% | |
0.0 | 6.0 | |
over 2 years ago | 27 days ago | |
Ruby | Ruby | |
MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rails_best_practices
Posts with mentions or reviews of rails_best_practices.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-06.
-
Rails application boilerplate for fast MVP development
add rails_best_practices
Rubycritic
Posts with mentions or reviews of Rubycritic.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-17.
-
First commits in a Ruby on Rails app
The third commit adds Rubycritic as a code quality static analysis.
-
Improve Code in Your Ruby Application with RubyCritic
You should consider using RubyCritic if you want a single place to review code improvements for your project. Including RubyCritic in your development process will certainly reduce the time a development team spends working on technical debts. Most technical debts will be mapped out at development time.
-
Best services and/or gems for automated generation of documentation, unit tests, and useful things of this nature
It's also possible to write unit tests in order to better understand or surface your assumptions about a legacy application. I'd also consider running rubycritic against legacy code, to see where the code smells and other hot spots lie.
-
How to Improve Code Quality on a Ruby on Rails Application
RubyCritic: a gem that wraps around static analysis gems such as Reek, Flay, and Flog to provide a quality report of your Ruby code.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing rails_best_practices and Rubycritic you can also consider the following projects:
Rubocop - A Ruby static code analyzer and formatter, based on the community Ruby style guide. [Moved to: https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop]
Reek - Code smell detector for Ruby
Brakeman - A static analysis security vulnerability scanner for Ruby on Rails applications
Pronto - Quick automated code review of your changes
MetricFu - A fist full of code metrics