raft VS etcd

Depending on your exact needs, you could try HashiCorp's Raft implementation: https://github.com/hashicorp/raft

I have found the performance tests very tricky to get to pass without having any input from others. The assignment is really very unforgiving, I would wager the test suite is comparable to how commercial Raft implementations are tested (e.g. https://github.com/hashicorp/raft)

While searching on GitHub, I found a pull request in the Raft implementation by Hashicorp (a distributed consensus algorithm), which we can use to demonstrate the following problem. Let’s start by showing the code (at api.go):

Hey,

you could inspire yourself by hashicorps raft implementation written in go and build one for typescript. Code is quite good to read and Go ins't that far away from typescript.

https://github.com/hashicorp/raft

Production-grade distributed consensus system.

In general Hashicorp's repos are high quality:

https://github.com/hashicorp/raft

Example application: https://github.com/Jille/raft-grpc-example

When building Kubernetes and configuring the Etcd service, if there is a misconfiguration or vulnerability risk point mentioned in the previous chapter, an attacker can use the Etcd risk point to launch an attack. We list the common attack methods of attackers here, and guide readers to understand the risks and threats faced by the Etcd service by means of attack and defense. Before we start to introduce common attacks, let's first understand a common etcd command line tool - etcdctl. etcdctl is a command line client that provides some concise commands. Users can interact with etcd services directly using the commands provided by etcdctl without using the HTTP API. It can be downloaded from the following address: https://github.com/coreos/etcd/releases Next, we analyze several attack scenarios one by one. the exposure way of public network

Can etcd be used as reliable database replacement? Since it is distributed and stores key/value pairs in a persistent way, it would be a great alternative nosql database. In addition, it has a great API. Can someone explain why this is not a thing?

rqlite gives you the functionality of a rock solid, fault-tolerant, replicated relational database, but with very easy installation, deployment, and operation. With it you've got a lightweight and reliable distributed relational data store. Think etcd or Consul, but with relational data modelling also available.

● etcd.service - etcd - highly-available key value store Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/etcd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Wed 2021-07-07 04:42:33 UTC; 4s ago Docs: https://github.com/coreos/etcd man:etcd Main PID: 1525 (etcd) Tasks: 9 (limit: 2353) Memory: 19.7M CGroup: /system.slice/etcd.service └─1525 /usr/bin/etcd

Docs: https://github.com/coreos/etcd