qunit VS tape

The tooling for testing JavaScript was far from what we have today, neither was the editor support. To test code that manipulates the DOM, you basically needed to run them in a browser. For that purpose we had an HTML page that would load QUnit, our test code, and our production code.

Mocha can also run in the browser: https://mochajs.org/#running-mocha-in-the-browser. An alternative library that can also run in the browser is QUnit: https://qunitjs.com/. You can include both with

QUNIT: QUnit was first installed on NPM, which is a javascript testing framework. It’s a javascript based unit testing framework. For more info: https://qunitjs.com/

Erm... QUnit?

It is a known fact that before any developer pushes the code (either to the development environment or Staging environment before migrating to the Production environment), he would be performing unit testing on the code changes that he has made. For unit testing, developers have a variety of unit-testing frameworks to choose from. JUnit and Jasmine are the most popular unit-testing frameworks. Other types of tests performed at a module/package level are functional tests and visual regression tests. Cucumber is a popular choice for Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) or functional testing, and a visual screenshot comparison tool named Wraith is preferred for performing visual regression testing.

I've written a JavaScript test framework on top of QUnit. The framework runs tests synchronously by running each one in a Promise. (Sorry for the length of this code block. I commented it as best I can, so it feels less tedious.)

Tests are located in the test/ folder. Load test/test.html in your browser of choice with any HTTP server you like (I use http-server). Tests are written in QUnit and are…

However, jQuery is still used today and has spawned other projects like jQuery UI and Quint.

Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners.

A more minimalist approach is this tape module and the TAP protocol. https://www.npmjs.com/package/tape

OK will do. Do you have any tips on finding a suitable project? Ideally I was hoping to to contribute to a piece of software that I actually use/know/like/want to improve. Given that, and my area of expertise, I had shortlisted Signal Desktop, and Tape.

Reactjs I have the following components: // Hello.jsexport default (React) => ({name}) => { return ( Hello {name ? name : 'Stranger'}! )}// App.jsimport createHello from './Hello'export default (React) => () => { const Hello = createHello(React) const helloProps = { name: 'Jane' } return ( )}// index.jsimport React from 'react'import { render } from 'react-dom'import createApp from './App'const App = createApp(React)render( , document.getElementById('app')) And I want to set up a test to see if the App component contains one Hello component. I tried the following, using Tape and Enzyme: import createApp from './App'import React from 'react'import test from 'tape'import { shallow } from 'enzyme'test('App component test', (assert) => { const App = createApp(React) const wrapper = shallow() assert.equal(wrapper.find('Hello').length === 1, true)}) But the result was that the length property of the find result was equal to 0, when I was expecting it to be equal to 1. So, how do I find my Hello component? Answer link : https://codehunter.cc/a/reactjs/find-component-by-display-name-when-the-component-is-stateless-functional-with-enzyme

For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up to date and npm began reporting vulnerabilities.

I really enjoy Ava [1] or anything assert-tape-like [2]. "uvu" [3] is getting a lot of love lately, but it's very feature limited and much of it's touted advantages are at the detriment to feature set.

[1] https://github.com/avajs/ava

[2] https://github.com/substack/tape

[3] https://github.com/lukeed/uvu

Jest is great for front-end (or full stack integration) testing, but I feel it's specialized for that use-case and doesn't always play nice with backend/middle-tier testing needs.

-Jest -React testing library -Enzyme -Sinon -Mocha -Chai -AVA -Tape

Tape