quickspec
Equational laws for free (by nick8325)
genvalidity
Validity and validity-based testing (by NorfairKing)
Our great sponsors
quickspec | genvalidity | |
---|---|---|
2 | 1 | |
247 | 154 | |
- | - | |
5.7 | 5.3 | |
about 1 month ago | 17 days ago | |
Haskell | Haskell | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
quickspec
Posts with mentions or reviews of quickspec.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-16.
-
Is anyone using quickspec?
It looks like that change is on github, but the version wasn't bumped, nor was it pushed to hackage https://github.com/nick8325/quickspec/blob/master/quickspec.cabal Perhaps try using github as the source instead of hackage?
-
Reverse of quickspec
Quickspec (https://github.com/nick8325/quickspec) is awesome in discovering laws in the code we write. But I am in search for a tool (the reverse) , which given the spec, can it synthesise code ?
genvalidity
Posts with mentions or reviews of genvalidity.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
-
Deriving via type parameters
I test it using the validity package (which seems to be similar to the more well-known checkers package, but has got more "stars" on GitHub).
What are some alternatives?
When comparing quickspec and genvalidity you can also consider the following projects:
QuickCheck - Automatic testing of Haskell programs.
hedgehog-classes - Hedgehog will eat your typeclass bugs
tasty - Modern and extensible testing framework for Haskell
smallcheck - Test your Haskell code by exhaustively checking its properties
HTF - Haskell Test Framework
quickcheck-state-machine - Test monadic programs using state machine based models
hspec - A Testing Framework for Haskell
speculate - Speculate laws about Haskell functions
checkers - Check properties on standard classes and data structures
hspec-hashable
ghc-prof-flamegraph
quickspec vs QuickCheck
genvalidity vs hedgehog-classes
quickspec vs tasty
genvalidity vs smallcheck
quickspec vs HTF
genvalidity vs quickcheck-state-machine
quickspec vs hspec
genvalidity vs tasty
quickspec vs speculate
genvalidity vs checkers
quickspec vs hspec-hashable
genvalidity vs ghc-prof-flamegraph