Que
Sidekiq
Our great sponsors
Que | Sidekiq | |
---|---|---|
10 | 88 | |
2,282 | 12,906 | |
0.4% | 0.6% | |
6.0 | 8.9 | |
17 days ago | 12 days ago | |
Ruby | Ruby | |
MIT License | GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Que
-
Choose Postgres Queue Technology
> Can you define "low throughput"?
<1000 messages per minute
Not saying SKIP LOCKED can't work with that many. But you'll probably want to do something better.
FWIW, Que uses advisory locks [1]
Few things.
1. The main downside to using PostgreSQL as a pub/sub bus with LISTEN/NOTIFY is that LISTEN is a session feature, making it incompatible with statement level connection pooling.
2. If you are going to do this use advisory locks [0]. Other forms of explicit locking put more pressure on the database while advisory locks are deliberately very lightweight.
My favorite example implementation is que [1] which is ported to several languages.
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/explicit-locking.htm...
-
Introducing tobox: a transactional outbox framework
Probably worth mentioning that aside from delayed_job there are at least two more modern alternatives backed by the DB: Que and good_job.
-
Sidekiq jobs in ActiveRecord transactions
Good article. Sidekiq is a good, well respected too. However if you are starting out I would recommend not using it, and instead choosing a DB based queue system. We have great success with que, but there are others like good_job.
-
SQL Maxis: Why We Ditched RabbitMQ and Replaced It with a Postgres Queue
(not sure why this comment was dead, I vouched for it)
There are a lot of ways to implement a queue in an RDBMS and a lot of those ways are naive to locking behavior. That said, with PostgreSQL specifically, there are some techniques that result in an efficient queue without locking problems. The article doesn't really talk about their implementation so we can't know what they did, but one open source example is Que[1]. Que uses a combination of advisory locking rather than row-level locks and notification channels to great effect, as you can read in the README.
-
Delayed Job vs. Sidekiq: Which Is Better?
https://github.com/que-rb/que
This one seems to be the most performant. By a lot too, from my understanding (haven't ran any benchmark myself, but the readme shows some good postgres knowledge)
-
Sidekiq VS Que - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 3 Feb 2022
Que seems like a good alternative if one doesn't want to use Reids. However, given that most apps need Redis (and have it within their infrastructure) nowadays, I still think that Sidekiq is the better option in the generic case.
-
Devious SQL: Message Queuing Using Native PostgreSQL
Implementations that use advisory locks like https://github.com/que-rb/que are much more efficient (atleast when I last tested) and will easily reach 10k job/s on even very modest hardware.
There is a Go port of Que but you can also easily port it to any language you like. I have a currently non-OSS implementation in Rust that I might OSS someday when I have time to clean it up.
-
Postgres is a great pub/sub and job server
It’s also possible to use advisory locks to implement a job queue in Postgres. See e.g. Que[1]. Note there are a fair number of corner cases, so studying Que is wise if trying to implement something like this, as well as some (a bit older) elaboration[2].
We implemented a similar design to Que for a specific use case in our application that has a known low volume of jobs and for a variety of reasons benefits from this design over other solutions.
-
Ruby Schedulers: Whenever vs Sidekiq Cron vs Sidekiq Scheduler
Do also take into consideration que-scheduler (disclaimer, am author). It is built on top of the robust que async job system.
Sidekiq
-
3 one-person million dollar online businesses
Sidekiq https://sidekiq.org/: This one started as an open source project, once it got enough traction, the developer made a premium version of it, and makes money by selling licenses to businesses.
-
Choose Postgres Queue Technology
Sidekiq will drop in-progress jobs when a worker crashes. Sidekiq Pro can recover those jobs but with a large delay. Sidekiq is excellent overall but it’s not suitable for processing critical jobs with a low latency guarantee.
-
We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
> I'm not sure feature withholding has traditionally worked out well in the developer space.
I think it's worked out well for Sidekiq (https://sidekiq.org). I really like their model of layering valuable features between the OSS / Pro / Enterprise licenses.
-
Exploring concurrent rate limiters, mutexes, semaphores
I was studying Sidekiq's page on rate limiters. The first type of rate limiting mentioned is the concurrent limiter: only n tasks are allowed to run at any point in time. Note that this is independent of time units (e.g. per second), or how long they take to run. The only limitation is the number of concurrent tasks/requests.
- Ask HN: What are some of the most elegant codebases in your favorite language?
-
Sidekiq and managing resumable jobs?
Uses Sidekiq's "fake" testing mode which will allow you to run the jobs explicitly
-
Organize Business Logic in Your Ruby on Rails Application
The code above isn't idempotent. If you run it twice, it will create two copies, which is probably not what you intended. Why is this important? Because most backend job processors like Sidekiq don't make any guarantees that your jobs will run exactly once.
There are several workarounds for this, like the magnificent Acidic Job gem or Sidekiq Pro/Enterprise features around enhanced reliability and unique jobs. Still, if they occur, bugs related to missing jobs and/or job idempotency are hard to track down and even harder to fix.
-
Where can I learn to deliver a proper solution?
I forgot to mention that reading code is also a good way to learn how to write code, it's like inspiration. Check repos of some gems you like. For example sidekiq https://github.com/sidekiq/sidekiq/tree/main/lib/sidekiq Or minitest https://github.com/minitest/minitest/tree/master/lib/minitest
What are some alternatives?
Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.
Sneakers - A fast background processing framework for Ruby and RabbitMQ
Shoryuken - A super efficient Amazon SQS thread based message processor for Ruby
Sucker Punch - Sucker Punch is a Ruby asynchronous processing library using concurrent-ruby, heavily influenced by Sidekiq and girl_friday.
Apache Kafka - Mirror of Apache Kafka
celery - Distributed Task Queue (development branch)
Delayed::Job - Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify
good_job - Multithreaded, Postgres-based, Active Job backend for Ruby on Rails.
Karafka - Ruby and Rails efficient Kafka processing framework
RocketJob - Ruby's missing background and batch processing system
Backburner - Simple and reliable beanstalkd job queue for ruby
Bunny - Bunny is a popular, easy to use, mature Ruby client for RabbitMQ