qawolf VS aws-testing-library

Compare qawolf vs aws-testing-library and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • Appwrite - The Open Source Firebase alternative introduces iOS support
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
  • SonarLint - Deliver Cleaner and Safer Code - Right in Your IDE of Choice!
qawolf aws-testing-library
3 3
3,052 101
1.2% -
5.8 9.1
6 months ago 18 days ago
TypeScript TypeScript
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of qawolf. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-01-13.


Posts with mentions or reviews of aws-testing-library. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-14.
  • Testing AWS Step Functions flows
    7 projects | | 14 Feb 2022
    First, I start the Step Function, and then I assert, using the aws-testing-library, whether the item was correctly saved into the Amazon DynamoDB.
  • Cloud Driven Development - Episode #001
    3 projects | | 11 Oct 2021
  • Testing the Async Cloud with AWS CDK
    7 projects | | 13 Sep 2021
    When writing tests using something like aws-testing-library or sls-test-tools, we must have credentials to an AWS account that at least lets us send a few events and subscribe to or query the results in order to perform assertions. Depending on the stance of our organization about cloud access, this could be completely fine or it could be a never-gonna-happen dealbreaker. Often this kind of approach will be OK for a development environment, but it could be unlikely to fly in production.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing qawolf and aws-testing-library you can also consider the following projects:

SeleniumBase - A web automation framework for Python developers. Includes a test generator, a pytest plugin, a dashboard, detailed reports, a driver manager, and more.

jest-mock-extended - Type safe mocking extensions for Jest

sls-test-tools - Custom Jest Assertions for Serverless integration testing.

Playwright - Playwright is a framework for Web Testing and Automation. It allows testing Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API.

gitbeaker - 🤖 GitLab API NodeJS library with full support of all the Gitlab API services.

cdk-eventbridge-socket - CDK construct that creates a WebSocket endpoint for you for any EventBridge rule you are interested in. (Built for debugging + testing )

tauri-action - Build your Web application as a Tauri binary for MacOS, Linux and Windows

Cypress - Fast, easy and reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser.

jest-codemods - Codemods for migrating to Jest 👾

express-typescript-boilerplate - A delightful way to building a RESTful API with NodeJs & TypeScript by @w3tecch

Recorder - A browser extension that generates Cypress, Playwright and Puppeteer test scripts from your interactions 🖱 ⌨

awesome-playwright - A curated list of awesome tools, utils and projects using Playwright