pyre-check
yapf
Our great sponsors
pyre-check | yapf | |
---|---|---|
23 | 21 | |
6,663 | 13,620 | |
0.8% | 0.4% | |
9.9 | 8.3 | |
about 10 hours ago | 9 days ago | |
OCaml | Python | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
pyre-check
-
Enhance Your Project Quality with These Top Python Libraries
Pyre is a performant type-checker developed by Facebook. Pyre can analyse codebases with millions of lines of code incrementally – providing instantaneous feedback to developers as they write code.
-
A Tale of Two Kitchens - Hypermodernizing Your Python Code Base
Pyre from Meta, pyright from Microsoft and PyType from Google provide additional assistance. They can 'infer' types based on code flow and existing types within the code.
-
Ruff v0.1.0
Have you seen Pyre[0]? Not Rust, OCaml, and pretty fast. Made by a team at Meta and open sourced on GitHub. If you use python-lsp, I wrote an extension[1] to enable integration (though I haven't tested it recently, been programming in rust; it is mostly a "for me" extension).
- Should I Rust or should I Go
- Writing Python like it's Rust
-
Buck2, a large scale build tool written in Rust by Meta, is now available
Internally we use Pyre for Python type checking: https://github.com/facebook/pyre-check
- Are there any sectors that use Haskell as a main programming language?
-
It is becoming difficult for me to be productive in Python
Before type hinting, work had intense rules and linters enforcing docstrings with types. Now, type hints and automatic pyre runs take care of all the heavy lifting.
-
Ruby 3.2’s YJIT is Production-Ready
Python now has an optional type system and if you add one of them such as mypy or pyre to your CI process and you can configure GitHub to refuse the pull request until types are added you can make it somewhat strongly typed.
If you have a preexisting codebase I believe the way you can convert it is to add the types that you know on commits and eventually you will have enough types that adding the missing ones should be easy. For the missing ones Any is a good choice.
https://pyre-check.org and https://github.com/python/mypy are popular.
-
Is there any other mainstream language (especially strongly typed compiled) whose type system is as powerful (or at least close) as Typescript? It's difficult to like other languages type system after using Typescript.
So to find things in a similar space, you need to look for languages with these sorts of constraints - so things like Sorbet for Ruby or pyright/pyre and you'll see similar and new ideas
yapf
-
Enhance Your Project Quality with These Top Python Libraries
YAPF (Yet Another Python Formatter): YAPF takes a different approach in that it’s based off of ‘clang-format’, a popular formatter for C++ code. YAPF reformats Python code so that it conforms to the style guide and looks good.
-
Why is Prettier rock solid?
I think I agree about the testing and labor of complicated translation rules.
But it doesn't appear that almost every pretty printer uses the Wadler pretty printing paper. It seems like MOST of them don't?
e.g. clang-format is one of the biggest and best, and it has a model that includes "unwrapped lines", a "layouter", a line break cost function, exhaustive search with memoization, and Dijikstra's algorithm:
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2013-04/jasper-slides.pdf
The YAPF Python formatter is based on this same algorithm - https://github.com/google/yapf
The Dart formatter used a model of "chunks, rules, and spans"
https://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2015/09/08/the-hardest-pr...
It almost seems like there are 2 camps -- the functional algorithms for functional/expression-based languages, and other algorithms for more statement-based languages.
Though I guess Prettier/JavaScript falls on the functional side.
I just ran across this survey on lobste.rs and it seems to cover the functional pretty printing languages influenced by Wadler, but functional style, but not the other kind of formatter ("Google" formatters perhaps)
-
A Tale of Two Kitchens - Hypermodernizing Your Python Code Base
To get all your code into a consistent format the next step is to run a formatter. I recommend black, the well-known uncompromising code formatter, which is the most popular choice. Alternatives to black are autoflake, prettier and yapf, if you do not agree with blacks constraints.
-
Front page news headline scraping data engineering project
Use yapf to format code -> https://github.com/google/yapf
-
Not sure if this is the worst or most genius indentation I've seen
https://github.com/google/yapf has configs, do ctrl+f SPLIT_COMPLEX_COMPREHENSION in the readme
- Google Python Style Guide
-
Enable hyphenation only for code blocks
Only as recommendation: If the lines of the source code (here: you C code you aim to document) are kept short, in manageable bytes (similar to entries parser.add_argument in Clark's "Tiny Python Projects", example seldomly pass beyond the frequently recommended threshold of 80 characters/line), reporting with listings becomes easier (equally, the reading of the difference logs/views by git and vimdiff), than with lines of say 120 characters per line. Though we no longer are constrained to 80 characters per line by terminals/screens and punch cards (when Fortran still was FORTRAN), this is a reason e.g., yapf for Python allows you to choose between 4 spaces/indentation (PEP8 style), or 2 spaces/indentation (Google style).
-
Which code formatter do you use?
YAPF. Black would have been fine too but I absolutely need tabs, not spaces, and Black won't do that. (Why tabs? Because they make my proportional font work better.)
- Automatically rearranging Python code?
-
From Python to Dart - Day 2, Meet the dart CLI
When working with several people on one project, it is very often necessary to use a single style of code design, writing comments, using variable names, etc. In the Python world, we use linters flake8, various formatters (black, yapf, autopep8) and mypy for type checking. How can Dart help meet these challenges?
What are some alternatives?
black - The uncompromising Python code formatter
pyright - Static Type Checker for Python
mypy - Optional static typing for Python
isort - A Python utility / library to sort imports.
flake8
autopep8 - A tool that automatically formats Python code to conform to the PEP 8 style guide.
pytype - A static type analyzer for Python code
typeshed - Collection of library stubs for Python, with static types
awesome-python-typing - Collection of awesome Python types, stubs, plugins, and tools to work with them.
typing - Python static typing home. Hosts the documentation and a user help forum.