pydantic VS Flask

utype is a concise alternative of pydantic with simplified parameters and usages, supporting both sync/async functions and generators parsing, and capable of using native logic operators to define logical types like AND/OR/NOT, also provides custom type parsing by register mechanism that supports libraries like pydantic, attrs and dataclasses

The easiest implementation I found was to use a PyDantic class for my target schema — and use that as a parameter for the method call to “ChatCompletion.create()”. Here’s a fragment of the GinAI Python classes used.

Also, FastStream uses Pydantic to parse input JSON-encoded data into Python objects, making it easy to work with structured data in your applications, so you can serialize your input messages just using type annotations.

Pydantic Validation: Leverage Pydantic's validation capabilities to serialize and validate incoming messages

Well the performance increase is so huge because pydantic1 is really really slow. And for using rust, I'd have expected more tbh…

I've been benchmarking pydantic v2 against typedload (which I write) and despite the rust, it still manages to be slower than pure python in some benchmarks.

The ones on the website are still about comparing to v1 because v2 was not out yet at the time of the last release.

pydantic's author will refuse to benchmark any library that is faster (https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/3264 https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/1525 https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/1810) and keep boasting about amazing performances.

On pypy, v2 beta was really really really slow.

As for the most utilized and still loved library, that would probably be pydantic, it helps declaring types so convenient - be it dto's, models or just complex arguments - and plays nice with bunch of other libraries from it's own ecosystem.

I did read this ... Pydantic Docs.

Schema validations logic — I use Pydantic for input validation and schema validation (boto responses, API responses, input validation, etc.) use cases. The Pydantic schema can contain type and value constraint checks or even more complicated logic with the custom validator code.

#!/usr/bin/python # # https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/3.0.x/installation/ # from flask import Flask, jsonify, request contacts = [ { "id": "1", "firstname": "Lorem", "lastname": "Ipsum", "email": "[email protected]", }, { "id": "2", "firstname": "Mauris", "lastname": "Quis", "email": "[email protected]", }, { "id": "3", "firstname": "Donec Purus", "lastname": "Purus", "email": "[email protected]", } ] app = Flask(__name__, static_url_path='', static_folder='public',) @app.route("/contact//save", methods=["PUT"]) def save_contact(id): data = request.json contacts[id - 1] = data return jsonify(contacts[id - 1]) @app.route("/contact/", methods=["GET"]) @app.route("/contact//edit", methods=["GET"]) def get_contact(id): return jsonify(contacts[id - 1]) @app.route('/') def root(): return app.send_static_file('index.html') if __name__ == '__main__': app.run(debug=True)

I was looking at all the big projects like numpy, pytorch, flask, etc.

Explore here.

I may use Flask-Admin initially to offload the "CRUD" operations to have an initial prototype fast but then drop it ASAP because I don't want to write a "flask-admin application" to fight against later on. If the application is mainly "CRUD", then Flask-Admin is suitable.

Now...

Would you do a breakdown/list of all the jobs you've done by sector/vertical and by function/role and by application functionality?

- [0]: https://flask.palletsprojects.com

- [1]: https://flask-admin.readthedocs.io/en/latest

- [2]: https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/2.3.x/patterns/celery

- [3]: https://sentry.io

- [4]: https://posthog.com

- [5]: https://www.docker.com

In the lab to follow, we will be setting up an end-to-end DevOps workflow for a Flask microservice with GitHub Actions, using a self-managed custom runner for maximal control over the pipeline execution environment and automating deployments to a local Kubernetes cluster. Furthermore, we will construct separate pipelines for our "development" and "production" environments to further elaborate on the concepts of continuous deployment and delivery.

Flask Micro web Framework: You will use Flask to build a Flask web application.

In an earlier post I mentioned a bunch of Open Source web applications. Let's now focus on the ones written in Python using Flask the light-weight web framework.

I also suggest that once you've gained familiarity with the basics, you look at micro-frameworks, such as FastAPI and flask, before switching to a full fat framework like django, which will give you an appreciation of what opinionated frameworks such as django can do for you.