purescript-halogen
Cycle.js
Our great sponsors
purescript-halogen | Cycle.js | |
---|---|---|
11 | 11 | |
1,510 | 10,235 | |
0.3% | 0.0% | |
3.6 | 4.1 | |
about 2 months ago | 5 months ago | |
PureScript | TypeScript | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
purescript-halogen
-
Designing an HTML Component system
There's a framework in purescript from which u can grab some ideas I think: https://github.com/purescript-halogen/purescript-halogen.
-
What can I do in Haskell? UwU
If you wanna do web frontends right now, I'd recommend Halogen for Purescript since it is maintained and has documentation.
-
Building Mystery Mansion Madness without a UI Framework
Before 2012, all of my websites were made using HTML, CSS and a sprinkling of JS. Then, I went all-in on AngularJS, followed by React. I started using Typescript and then PureScript and learned more frameworks like Halogen and Concur. I even wrote my own UI framework called purescript-deku.
-
Inflist, an experiment using PureScript and React
First of all I had to choose what to use to manage the User Interface. I narrowed down to two modules: Halogen and react-basic-hooks (which is a “wrapper” of the unmaintained react-basic). I decided to go with react-basic-hooks just because I work with React on a daily basis and I wanted to understand its interoperability with PureScript. I will 10/10 try Halogen too in the next future since as far as I can see is the most famous and maintained in the PureScript community.
-
State of Scala.js frameworks
There's also Purescript, which is sort of a Haskell for frontend. It has type classes, HKTs and so on and also has a very nice FFI. When it comes to UI libraries there is Halogen which I think is very well though out and allows for using tagless final approach. There's also react-basic but I haven't used that one myself.
-
Solid JS Good for Production and what are the Pro and Cons ?
My favorite webapp stack at the moment is Halogen (PureScript UI library); I have always gravitated toward functional programming and strong static typing. For commercial work, however, I use React. While it isn’t perfect it strikes, for me, the right balance of purity, composability, and simplicity.
-
Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
Yeah? I wrote something to deal with it too (https://github.com/toastal/return-optics) 5.5 years ago. You arguably chose the wrong data as `(model, Cmd msg, Maybe extMsg)` instead of `(model, Cmd msg, List extMsg)` which would give you more flexibility and still functions as a monoid on [] instead of Nothing, but allows multiple messages shrug. I tried this approach more recently and it involved me having to encode all of actions in a massive tree and then I still had issues with certain messages including now having to UUID all elements that that previously I didn't need to think about. It was a mess, but the best I could do with the tools at hand.
If you compare this to Halogen (https://github.com/purescript-halogen/purescript-halogen/blo...) where you still have purity but can set up subscribers and listeners from any component. It's much easier to use and for some components like dialogs, it's much simpler. And this actually isn't the best example because with the latest Halogen, Portals (https://github.com/purescript-halogen/purescript-halogen/pul...) was introduced so you can launch a dialog on the spot instead of even needing to communicate between them at all.
-
7 Useful Tools Written in Haskell
Below you can find the example of a simple button component written in Halogen:
- PureScript and Haskell
- Q: Webapps in Purescript for Haskellers
Cycle.js
- Could angular possibly compile rxjs Ahead Of Time?
-
Can be the future of JSX be Functional first?
Seems like you might be interested in this
-
Front-end Guide
Cycle
-
[AskJS] Opinions In Favor of Coding Document Fragments in JS?
This is the standard way of going about things in Mithril and Cycle. Elm as well doesn't use an XML knockoff for view code- and as a fun fact, the original version of React didn't either.
- What is a really cool thing you would want to write in Rust but don't have enough time, energy or bravery for?
- Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
-
callbag-rs: An implementation of the callbag spec
For example, an FRP framework (created by the same author who later wrote the callbag spec): https://cycle.js.org/
-
Does it make sense to use Scala.js/Laminar in the context of a startup?
TypeScript is relatively mainstream at this point, and I think that's good news. If you want to crank the type-safety and pure FP dials on it to 11, you certainly can do that. I have a project that I've based largely on this post, including the "hardcore" section. However, instead of Redux and otherwise plain React, I've chosen to use Cycle.js and the lessons from this post to use React in a very purely Functional Reactive Programming Way.
-
Flame: A PureScript front-end framework inspired by the Elm architecture
This post links to a PureScript project that is probably the easiest PS framework around.
ReScript + rescript-react is a good alternative. Less safe, waaaay more verbose; but backed by Facebook.
This is quite cute (in TypeScript though): https://github.com/cyclejs/cyclejs
And Yew is super cool, it goes the WASM route (in Rust): https://github.com/yewstack/yew
-
My Open Source Journey
From now on I was on what I would call a typical open source trajectory. I used the Cycle.js framework to rewrite my frontend and in that process I hit some walls. I eventually figured that the error was on my side and that I was just missing some information to avoid the error. To spare others the hours of debugging I started to contribute small patches to the documentation. At the same time I also found some missing features that I voiced in GitHub issues.
What are some alternatives?
solid-start - SolidStart, the Solid app framework
RxJS - A reactive programming library for JavaScript
purescript-flame - Fast & simple framework for building web applications
MobX - Simple, scalable state management.
solid-site - Code that powers the SolidJS.com platform.
Bacon - Functional reactive programming library for TypeScript and JavaScript
reagent - A minimalistic ClojureScript interface to React.js
Most.js - Ultra-high performance reactive programming
nixos-config - My NixOS configuration
Cycle.js (react-native) - Cycle.js driver that uses React Native to render
purescript-react-basic - An opinionated set of bindings to the React library, optimizing for the most basic use cases
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.