puck VS GrapesJS

See the full changelog for all changes via the GitHub release.

If you’re starting from scratch, you can also use one of the Puck recipes to spin up a new project:

⭐ Support us on GitHub by dropping a star

Puck is an embeddable, modular, open-source visual editor for React with built-in support for complex drag-and-drop page building. While GrapesJS provides a barebones page building experience, and tools like Builder.io and Storyblok offer fully-fledged CMS platforms, Puck aims to bridge the gap. It combines an extendable ready to use page editor with a fully decoupled page export model—giving you flexibility without locking you into a specific backend or proprietary ecosystem.

That would be wonderful, but will require some further work. Puck doesn't provide a grid, but it supports user grid implementations.

To support something like you're suggesting would likely require an official Grid component, which I'm now tracking here: https://github.com/measuredco/puck/issues/843

The official next recipe now uses Next 15.1 and React 19 by default. If you're using the recipe and want to upgrade, make sure you also upgrade to React 19 as required by Next 15 when using the App Router. See the official Next.js upgrade guide for more info.

I was using another great library called puck, which is basically a very customisable editor, that can create sites/newsletters/pdfs (something visual) and came to the next step which was turning the output of the editor into a PDF.

We're grateful for the community's support and contributions. Join the conversation on GitHub and Discord.

Hello fellow hackers!

We launched Puck in September [on Hackernews](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37391848) after building it for our clients, and had a wild ride to the front page!

I wanted to share a little update on what's happened since:

1. 3.7k starts [on GitHub](https://github.com/measuredco/puck)!

Website: https://grapesjs.com/

Grapes Studio Website

Like Tiptap, GrapesJS is a headless framework, but one specifically built for page editors, giving you the flexibility to create fully custom drag-and-drop experiences without being tied to a specific CMS, backend, or ecosystem. This means it provides the core editing logic but leaves most of the UI implementation and content management entirely up to you.

GrapesJS [https://grapesjs.com] | Senior Full Stack Engineer (Node.js/React ) | Remote | Full time

We are looking for a highly skilled and experienced Full Stack Engineer specializing in the Node.js/React stack to join our dynamic team. This role is crucial to the development and maintenance of the GrapesJS framework ecosystem, including its core, plugins, and the new GrapesJS Studio editor. You will work closely with our team to push the boundaries of what’s possible with GrapesJS and deliver innovative solutions that empower our global community of developers and companies.

We are looking for a senior full stack engineer with strong front end knowledge. We’re looking for someone with at least five years experience in:

- JavaScript/Typescript/Node, HTML, CSS, and modern front-end frameworks.

- SSR, RESTful APIs and asynchronous request handling in Node.js (eg. using Next.js or similar).

Compensation: Competitive with experience + Equity

Contact griffin[at]grapesjs.com with your resume if interested.

other commenter shared it https://grapesjs.com/

Not really tried the Claude 3.5, later tried o1-preview on github models and recently Qwen2.5 32B for a prompt to generate a litestar[0] app to manage a wysiwyg content using grapesjs[1] and use pelican[2] to generate static site. It generated very bad code and invented many libraries in import which didn't exist. Cluade was one of the worst code generator, later tried sieve of atkin to generate primes to N and then use miller-rabin test to test each generated prime both using all the cpu core available. Claude completely failed and could never get a correct code without some or the other errors especially using multiprocess, o1-preview got it right in first attempt, Qwen 2.5 32B got it right in 3'rd error fix. In general for some very simple code Claude is correct but when using something new it completely fails, o1-preview performs much better. Give a try to generate some manim community edition visualization using Claude, it generates something not working correct or with errors, o1-preview much better job.

In most of my test o1-preview performed way better than Claude and Qwen was not that bad either.

[0] https://github.com/litestar-org/litestar

[1] https://grapesjs.com/

[3] https://getpelican.com/

GrapesJS is a free email marketing tool to build responsive and professional emails. It offers a component-based interface that enables building blocks in email templates.

GitHub https://github.com/GrapesJS/grapesjs GitHub Star 20.6k The most recent update on GitHub One week ago Official website https://grapesjs.com/ Documentation https://grapesjs.com/docs/

What I found was GrapesJS. I'd definitely recommend it: https://grapesjs.com/

Open-source web builder framework for creating templates without coding. Website - GitHub