proton-mail VS OpenVPN

The linked site is very low on info high on outrageous claims. It is not the same as gmail and protons response to that paper are accurate imo. The fact is web clients are inherently insecure but you can run your own client entirely afaik (https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-mail). I don't think anybody has evidence of wrong doing but the service is proprietary so...

I was switched from beta to stable release but saw another update and when I clicked on it, I was reverted back to the old design and couldn't find a switch to go the beta again. I had to use beta.protonmail.com address to go back to the beta. The information you have written in comments below is inaccurate. I'm a bit disappointed by this.

The new web app has been open source for a while already and can be found here: https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-mail

Well, to log to beta you can simply go to beta.protonmail.com when needed.

If you want it to, you check check out the beta version (beta.protonmail.com) - that offers the ability to stay logged in on the web.

For example, if I wanted to add beta.protonmail.com to a container, I am running into the issue where I cannot add beta.protonmail.com to always open in a container because as soon as visiting the site, it would redirect to https://account.protonmail.com/login. So the beta.protonmail.com would never open in a container tab, but then it would open the login page by opening a brand new tab.

You've been pointed at https://beta.protonmail.com/ already.

Hi! Have you checked out beta.protonmail.com? It has a sleek new interface, and we think the login page will be more to your liking :)

OpenVPN is hiring! https://openvpn.net/

C++ Developer in the United States. Full-time| Fully remote| Flexible work schedules

Link to look at vacancy details and apply:

How you connect to your modem will depend on the device you are using, but for windows laptops as an example you download the OpenVPN program and input your modem details there, much like you would any other vpn service. I think there would be some guides on youtube. https://openvpn.net/

I just started playing with CloudConnexa for remotely managing my second pFSense. Really nice and is free for up to 3 concurrent users. https://openvpn.net. Can also self-host OpenVPN access server with a free 2 concurrent license.

If anyone is being blocked check out free OpenVPN

It is likely an issue with the 'cipher' options, if any, that are in your ".opvn" file. This is telling you that the opvn setting is not finding a matching cipher it is allowed to use. The fix per the message would be to add the Servers cipher to your options. https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn-gui/issues/381 https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/blob/master/doc/man-sections/cipher-negotiation.rst

I too haven't used the client-nat directive in some years (I currently implement 1:1 NAT with pfsense to access my network because I'm too lazy to change the networks subnet from the default) so I decided to retest and it does appear that OpenVPN Connect clients do not properly support the client-nat directive but the traditional OpenVPN server/clients still do. I've just tested this on OpenVPN 2.6.3 Server, OpenVPN 2.6.1 GUI for Windows from openvpn.net, and OpenVPN Connect iOS 3.3.3 and only the OpenVPN Connect client has any difficulty. Difficulty being that you can use client-nat successfully but it has to be configured server-side it can't be pushed to or setup on the client (OpenVPN Connect) side. The Server and Windows (non-OpenVPN Connect) clients work an any setup whether it's configured server-side, pushed to the client, or set up in the client config.

Ask openvpn.net for commercial support: https://support.openvpn.com/

OpenVPN is a VPN client that I used primarily for work. We used VPN to connect to the dev server and we are using VPN. I also sometimes used that to open websites that got blocked in Indonesia like Reddit.

I connect all the servers with secure OpenVPN private network. And block unused ports anywhere with ufw.

Ensure remote access is by VPN only like the site-to-site with Ubiquitis gear, WireGuard or OpenVPN and there could be a paid option I just don't know.