promscale VS tsbs

Now that Promscale has been deprecated, what are the other ideal means of self-hosted long term Prometheus storage?

Oh wow, I browsed the project just a few weeks ago, didn't see it then. I see the deprecation is recent (https://github.com/timescale/promscale/issues/1836)

They say:

> if you want to have a seamless experience between metrics and traces, then current experience of stitching together Prometheus & Jaeger is not great.

But I wonder if using Promscale https://github.com/timescale/promscale would make Prometheus & Jaeger not such a big problem as SigNoz imply.

Promscale readme:

> Promscale is a unified metric and trace observability backend for Prometheus, Jaeger and OpenTelemetry built on PostgreSQL and TimescaleDB.

Either way, SigNoz seems interesting indeed. And am glad to see that SigNoz supports OpenTelemetry.

Hi! So the team is over 100 at this point, but engineering effort is spread across multiple products at this point.

The core timescaledb repo [0] has 10-15 primary engineers (although we are aggressively hiring for database internal engineers), with a few others working on DB hyperfunctions and our function pipelining [1] in a separate extension [2]. I think generally the set of folks who contribute to low-level database internals in C is just smaller than other type of projects.

We also have our promscale product [3], which is our observability backend powered by SQL & TimescaleDB.

And then there is Timescale Cloud, which is obviously a large engineering effort (most of which does not happen in public repos).

And we are hiring. Fully remote & global.

https://www.timescale.com/careers

[0] https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb

[1] https://www.timescale.com/blog/function-pipelines-building-f...

[2] https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb-toolkit

[3] https://github.com/timescale/promscale ; https://github.com/timescale/tobs

Promscale is a connector for Prometheus, one of the leading open-source monitoring solutions. Promscale is developed by Timescale, a time series database with full compatibility to Postgres. Since logs are time series events, Timescale developed Promscale to ingest events from Prometheus and make them available in SQL. You can install Promscale in numerous ways.

In case it helps, Promscale (from Timescale) offers long-term storage for Prometheus data and supports both PromQL and SQL queries. Here's the project page: https://www.timescale.com/promscale/ and the repo is here https://github.com/timescale/promscale It also support OpenTelemetry tracing if that's of interest.

At first, let's give the definition of `time series`. This is a series of (timestamp, value) pairs ordered by timestamp. The `value` may contain arbitrary data - a floating-point value, a text, a json, a data structure with many columns, etc. Each time series is uniquely identified by its name plus an optional set of {label="value"} labels. For example, temperature{city="London",country="UK"} or log_stream{host="foobar",datacenter="abc",app="nginx"}.

ClickHouse is perfectly optimized for storing and querying of such time series, including metrics. That's true that ClickHouse isn't optimized for handling millions of tiny inserts per second. It prefers infrequent batches with big number of rows per each batch. But this isn't the real problem in practice, because:

1) ClickHouse provides Buffer table engine for frequent inserts.

2) It is easy to create a special proxy app or library for data buffering before sending it to ClickHouse.

TimescaleDB provides Promscale [1] - a service, which allows using TimescaleDB as a storage backend for Prometheus. Unfortunately, it doesn't show outstanding performance comparing to Prometheus itself and to other remote storage solutions for Prometheus. Promscale requires more disk space, disk IO, CPU and RAM according to production tests [2], [3].

[1] https://github.com/timescale/promscale

[2] https://abiosgaming.com/press/high-cardinality-aggregations/

[3] https://valyala.medium.com/promscale-vs-victoriametrics-reso...

Full disclosure: I'm CTO at VictoriaMetrics - competing solution for TimescaleDB. VictoriaMetrics is built on top of architecture ideas from ClickHouse.

Promscale + TimescaleDB

To prove how much better InfluxDB 3.0 performs, we decided to compare it against InfluxDB 1.8 using the Time Series Benchmark Suite (TSBS) originally developed by InfluxData and now maintained, to some extent, by Timescale. Because InfluxDB 3.0 supports InfluxQL and InfluxDB’s line protocol, in theory the test suite for 1.8 should be able to run on the new public alpha. In fact, we did run into several compatibility issues during the testing process and had to find workarounds; this is discussed in the Methodology section below.

To simulate a more advanced dataset, see Time-series Benchmarking Suite (TSBS).

The overhead from inserting a wide row (say, 50, 100, 250 columns) is going to be much higher than inserting a narrower row (more network I/O, more parsing and data processing, larger writes to WAL, etc.). Most of our published benchmarks are using TSBS, which uses 12 columns per row. So you'll correspondingly see lower insert rates if you have very wide rows.

AFAIK https://github.com/timescale/tsbs is based on artificial data and I would recommend running benchmarks and comparisons on real data from node_exporter, like https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/prometheus-benchmark.

1. correctness: from small units tests to relatively complex integrations tests. they typically populate a test database and query it via various interfaces, such as REST or the Postgres protocol. we use Azure Pipelines to execute them - testing in MacoOS, Linux (both Intel and ARM) and Windows.

2. performance: we tend to use the TSBS project for most of our performance testing and profiling. fun fact: we actually had to patch it as the vanilla TSBS was a bottleneck in some tests. Sadly, the PR with the improvements is still not merged: https://github.com/timescale/tsbs/pull/186