pnpm VS deno

We assume that Node.js and pnpm are already installed. The setup was performed on macOS, but it should work in any modern shell environment.

I think this is somewhat funny.

His comment is pretty understandable if you've done frontend work in javascript.

Node_modules is so ripe for duplicate content that some tools explicitly call out that they're disk efficient (It's literally in the tagline for PNPM "Fast, disk space efficient package manager": https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm)

So he got ok results (~13% savings) on possibly the best target content available in a user's home directory.

Then he got results so bad it's utterly not worth doing on the rest (0.10% - not 10%, literally 1/10 of a single percent).

---

Deduplication isn't super simple, isn't always obviously better, and can require other system resources in unexpected ways (ex - lots of CPU and RAM). It's a cool tech to fiddle with on a NAS, and I'm generally a fan of modern CoW filesystems (incl APFS).

But I want to be really clear - this is people picking spare change out of the couch style savings. Penny wise, pound foolish. The only people who are likely to actually save anything buying this app probably already know it, and have a large set of real options available. Everyone else is falling into the "download more ram" trap.

3) Pnpm (Space Saver & high performant)

pnpm or npm or yarn

My stack of choice is node and pnpm, but this should work for most commonly used tools.

pnpm 10

The State of JavaScript 2024 survey results GitHub Copilot is now Free Tailwind CSS 4 JerryScript 3.0 Transformers.js v3.2 Bun 1.1.39 & 1.1.40 pnpm Update ESLint v9.17.0

Pretty simple. Now, I just needed to change the code to use Playwright instead of Puppeteer and Jest. Oh, and I also wanted to use pnpm instead of npm. Here’s a link to my forked GitHub repo.

Lume[1] is also a static site generator for Deno JavaScript Engine [2]. Indeed it is impossible to find a 4-letter name that doesn't clash using the Latin alphabet and that sounds like a name.

[1] https://lume.land/

[2] https://deno.com/

I love Deno and I use this, but I really wish they would fix this dumb bug:

https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/16466

They're going to add it once it stabilizes in Node: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/24828#issuecomment-2...

Not that this helps retroactively, but the proper SQLite that's in fact already inside the Deno binary will soon be usable from JS/TS when https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/27308 is landed, as opposed to one of the several somewhat hacky third-party packages, one of which you presumably tried.

☆ Star Deno

Deno: A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript.

However, Deno does not yet support that, so you will have to copy that config and merge it manually. Once that is done, you can replace the use of tsc command by directly invoking Deno on the .ts file.

Deno received a $20M investment in 2022, how will it make a profit? It developed Deno Deploy, focusing on the Edge advantage, ultimately aiming to make money through online services.

Deno is a JS runtime developed in recent years, focusing on TS support and network security. It received a $20M investment in the first two years and recently released Deno 2.0, which is currently developing rapidly

Deno stable version was introduced about 3-4 years ago. At that time, it received quite a bit of attention because none other than Ryan Dahl, the creator of Node.js, was also the patron of Deno. Huh! You heard that right. Why would he create a new tool to compete with his own "child"?