pixel-saver VS gnome-shell-impatience

GTK Title Bar / Unite / Pixel Saver - one of these will get rid of the title bars in maximized windows. [I use Unite]

Ok this seem to work (unofficially: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/723/pixel-saver/)

There are plenty of GNOME extensions that can do this. My favorite is Unite, another ones that work in GNOME 40 are Pixel Saver and No Title Bar - Forked

Pixel Saver is an extension that removes the title bar and puts the window controls in the top bar when in fullscreen. Works on 40 and 3.38 Gnome Extensions | GitHub

https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/277/impatience/

Focus changer: Change focus between windows in all directions using your keyboard

do people even use gnome without impatience?

Recently, I installed the Impatience GNOME Shell extension in order to double GNOME animations speed.

I wanted to double animations speed in GNOME because I find them slow, and I recently read about the Impatience GNOME Shell extension. I found that cool so I downloaded it, extracted it and moved to my $HOME/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions folder. I downloaded the right version, for my GNOME 41, it shows up in gnome-extensions list and Extensions app. However, as long as the extension is turned on, the animations are completely disabled, which improves my system speed but is not quite what I'm looking for. I'm about to try some alternatives like Just Perfection, but if I'm missing something about Impatience, please let me know: I like its simplicity and I kinda want to use it.