pool-conduit
Persistence interface for Haskell allowing multiple storage methods. (by yesodweb)
cryptonite
lowlevel set of cryptographic primitives for haskell (by haskell-crypto)
Our great sponsors
| pool-conduit | cryptonite | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 6 | |
| 455 | 224 | |
| 0.9% | - | |
| 7.5 | 0.0 | |
| 2 months ago | about 1 year ago | |
| Haskell | C | |
| MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
pool-conduit
Posts with mentions or reviews of pool-conduit.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-06.
-
Problem with Persistent.runSqlPool and Servant Handel
I understand that the "new" version of Persistent requires Servant Handler to be MonadUnliftIO which is not the case. I also understand that I am suppose to use acquireSqlConn somehowe (following this this), but I can't figure it out. Any ideas ?
-
Was simplified subsumption worth it for industry Haskell programmers?
I don't think there's any malicious intent. It seems pretty clear that the motivation here is to simplify the type checker considerably, which is a really good reason to do something. Heck, I've got an open issue for deleting a feature in persistent which (according to the lack of comments on the issue) only ever used by persistent's own test suite.
-
[ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.2 is now available!
PR submitted: https://github.com/yesodweb/persistent/pull/1366 :)
- Simple Servant + Persistent + Katip template for starting a new project
-
Async Control Flow
Ha, I spotted a possible resource leak here. If stmtFinalize fail, then the connection won't be closed.
-
Using a different version of a package than what exists in resolver.
text Cloning b1e32adfe1da49cd9df997a13bd0c5b391486f5c from https://github.com/yesodweb/persistent.git No cabal file found for Repo from https://github.com/yesodweb/persistent.git, commit b1e32adfe1da49cd9df997a13bd0c5b391486f5c
cryptonite
Posts with mentions or reviews of cryptonite.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-05.
-
Crypton is forked from cryptonite with the original authors permission
There was also the Haskell-crypto fork (https://github.com/haskell-crypto/cryptonite) which was done for similar reasons - will this fork include any of its changes? I can’t remember if much was actually done in that project, most of the work has been on the libsodium library. It would be good to have just one place for all of this, perhaps Kazu could consider moving crypton into that organisation and helping contribute.
-
[ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.2 is now available!
GHC 9.2 support for cryptonite is added in this PR: https://github.com/haskell-crypto/cryptonite/pull/354 So that should be fixed soon i guess..
- A new future for cryptography in Haskell
- List of upcoming breaking changes
-
NorfairKing/haskell-dangerous-functions ; Call for contributions
fromIntegral is no joke, for example https://github.com/haskell-crypto/cryptonite/issues/330
-
[Haskell-cafe] Future of package cryptonite
The main issue is actually inability to switch to newer GHC 9.0, which seems blocked by other packages
What are some alternatives?
When comparing pool-conduit and cryptonite you can also consider the following projects:
hocilib - A lightweight Haskell binding to the OCILIB C API
cprng-aes - Crypto Pseudo Random Number Generator using AES in counter mode
eventstore - EventStore Haskell TCP Client
elocrypt - Generate easy-to-remember, hard-to-guess passwords
persistent-odbc - uses persistent connecting via hdbc odbc
merkle-tree
HongoDB - A Simple Key Value Store
HsOpenSSL - OpenSSL binding for Haskell
HDBC - Haskell Database Connectivity
xxhash - Haskell implementation of the XXHash algorithm
persistent-relational-record - Persistent adapter for Haskell Relational Record
ed25519 - Minimal ed25519 Haskell package, binding to the ref10 SUPERCOP implementation.
pool-conduit vs hocilib
cryptonite vs cprng-aes
pool-conduit vs eventstore
cryptonite vs elocrypt
pool-conduit vs persistent-odbc
cryptonite vs merkle-tree
pool-conduit vs HongoDB
cryptonite vs HsOpenSSL
pool-conduit vs HDBC
cryptonite vs xxhash
pool-conduit vs persistent-relational-record
cryptonite vs ed25519