password-manager-resources VS msquic

Compare password-manager-resources vs msquic and see what are their differences.

password-manager-resources

A place for creators and users of password managers to collaborate on resources to make password management better. (by apple)

msquic

Cross-platform, C implementation of the IETF QUIC protocol, exposed to C, C++, C# and Rust. (by microsoft)
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
password-manager-resources msquic
19 19
4,009 3,802
1.5% 2.1%
7.8 9.6
15 days ago 2 days ago
JavaScript C
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

password-manager-resources

Posts with mentions or reviews of password-manager-resources. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-07.

msquic

Posts with mentions or reviews of msquic. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-04-02.
  • Avoiding HTTP/3 (for a while) as a pragmatic default
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Apr 2023
    I referred to sockets as an API design, not to express an opinion on whether you should place your protocol implementations inside or outside the kernel. (Although that’s undeniably an interesting question that by all rights should have been settled by now, but isn’t.)

    Even then, I didn’t mean you should reproduce the Berkeley socket API verbatim (ZeroMQ-style); multiple streams per connection does not sound like a particularly good fit to it (although apparently people have managed to fit SCTP into it[1]?). I only meant that with the current mainstream libraries[2,3,4], establishing a QUIC connection and transmitting bytestreams or datagrams over it seems quite a bit more involved than performing the equivalent TCP actions using sockets.

    [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6458

    [2] https://quiche.googlesource.com/quiche

    [3] https://github.com/microsoft/msquic

    [4] https://github.com/litespeedtech/lsquic

  • My plan for making 256bit signed and unsigned integers in C. Please help me understand this concept better.
    2 projects | /r/C_Programming | 26 Mar 2023
    The documentation of MS QUIC says it is cross-platform, it should work on Linux, it has a CMake preset for Linux and you can download the prebuilt binary releases for Linux.
  • Best performing quic implementation?
    4 projects | /r/rust | 5 Mar 2023
  • Show HN: Protect Your CI/CD from SolarWinds-Type Attacks with This Agent
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Jan 2023
    Hello HN, my name is Varun, and I am the co-founder of StepSecurity. Here is the backstory about Harden-Runner. We thoroughly researched past software supply chain security incidents. The devastating breaches of SolarWinds, Codecov, and others, have one thing in common – they attacked the CI/ CD pipeline or the build server.

    These incidents made it clear that a purpose-built security agent was needed for CI/ CD. While there are numerous agents available for desktops and servers, such as from CrowdStrike and Lacework, none have been tailored specifically to address the unique risks present in CI/CD pipelines.

    With the understanding that a specialized solution was needed to secure CI/CD environments, we developed Harden-Runner, an open-source solution tailored specifically for GitHub Actions hosted runners. It can be seamlessly integrated into your workflow by simply adding a step. The agent installation process is also lightning-fast, taking no more than 5 seconds to complete.

    Harden-Runner's security agent is designed to closely monitor all aspects of the workflow run, including DNS, network, file, and process events. This allows for real-time identification of any potential security breaches. To prevent incidents like the Codecov breach, where exfiltration of credentials occurred, Harden-Runner allows you to set policies that restrict outbound traffic at both the DNS and network layers. Additionally, we are actively working on implementing further restrictions at the application layer, such as using HTTP verbs and paths, to provide an even more comprehensive security solution.

    An excellent example of how Harden-Runner effectively blocks outbound traffic can be found in the following link: https://app.stepsecurity.io/github/microsoft/msquic/actions/.... As you can see, all traffic to unauthorized endpoints is highlighted in red, indicating that it has been blocked; this is because these endpoints are not included in the allowed list defined in the GitHub Actions workflow file, which can be viewed here: https://github.com/microsoft/msquic/blob/aaecb0fac5a3902dd24....

    One of the key features of Harden-Runner's monitoring capabilities is its ability to detect any tampering or alteration of files during the build process, similar to the SolarWinds incident. To further enhance security and protect against potential malicious tools or attempts to disable the agent, Harden-Runner includes a disable-sudo mode. This mode effectively disables the use of 'sudo' on the hosted runner, providing an additional layer of protection

    Harden-Runner has already been adopted by over 600 open-source repositories: https://github.com/step-security/harden-runner/network/depen.... To fully understand the capabilities of Harden-Runner and how it can protect against past supply chain attacks, please try out our attack simulator GitHub repository at https://github.com/step-security/attack-simulator. I would love to hear your feedback.

  • Least painful path to multiplatform builds?
    4 projects | /r/cpp_questions | 10 Aug 2022
    https://github.com/microsoft/msquic (QUIC / HTTP3)
  • msquic VS MsQuic.Net - a user suggested alternative
    2 projects | 15 Jul 2022
  • The Illustrated QUIC Connection
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 20 Jun 2022
    3 projects | /r/netsec | 22 Apr 2022
  • .plan
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Nov 2021
  • The QUIC API OpenSSL will not provide
    2 projects | /r/programming | 27 Oct 2021
    I don't think that's true, Microsoft is already doing their own thing: https://github.com/microsoft/msquic

What are some alternatives?

When comparing password-manager-resources and msquic you can also consider the following projects:

quiche - 🥧 Savoury implementation of the QUIC transport protocol and HTTP/3

lsquic - LiteSpeed QUIC and HTTP/3 Library

quinn - Async-friendly QUIC implementation in Rust

shadowsocks-rust - A Rust port of shadowsocks

openmptcprouter - OpenMPTCProuter is an open source solution to aggregate multiple internet connections using Multipath TCP (MPTCP) on OpenWrt

mvfst - An implementation of the QUIC transport protocol.

openssl - TLS/SSL and crypto library with QUIC APIs

aiortc - WebRTC and ORTC implementation for Python using asyncio

usrsctp - A portable SCTP userland stack

yomo - 🦖 Stateful Serverless Framework for building Geo-distributed Edge AI Infra

rust-cfitsio - FFI wrapper around cfitsio in Rust

security.txt