Papercups
linaria
Our great sponsors
Papercups | linaria | |
---|---|---|
19 | 46 | |
5,615 | 11,182 | |
0.9% | 0.9% | |
0.0 | 8.4 | |
2 months ago | 22 days ago | |
Elixir | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Papercups
-
Linen.dev – Building a chat app with Elixir and NextJS
The best language for the task at hand, when presented with time constraints, is the one that you already know well. OP said in the article that they authored Papercups [1]. Adopting Elixir for a websocket-push service makes a lot of sense, then. However, why don't you learn Elixir, some OTP, and then reconsider that question? You could be missing out.
[1] https://github.com/papercups-io/papercups
-
What Phoenix Elixir Tutorial do you want to see?
https://github.com/papercups-io/papercups - 5.2k stars, uses Phoenix 1.6
-
Complete, Production-Ready Phoenix Reference Applications
Papercups
- Looking for recommendation of OS phoenix app to look at
- Example of an elixir CRUD app in production
- Show HN: Open-source live customer chat
-
Lessons from answering 800 customer support queries in last 2 yrs as a founder
Shameless plug here if anyone is interested in an open source live chat tool check out https://github.com/papercups-io/papercups
- Create a conversation with Elixir with real code examples
-
Ask HN: What novel tools are you using to write web sites/apps?
Phoneix - Elixir
We're a live message tool and it is basically what Elixir is built for https://github.com/papercups-io/papercups.
The Elixir community has been great and incredibly friendly. I originally was worried about the size of the community but that hasn't been an issue the community has been super helpful. I also think the annual stackoverflow usage surveys are very misleading because most of the community's questions get asked in ElixirForum and not on Stackoverflow.
Phoneix is the web framework of Elixir which is very similar to Rails but minus a lot of the magic has been very helpful for our productivity as well.
If I had to built another service that is websocket heavy I would definitely use Elixir. Even if it was a standard crud app I would still most likely choose Elixir.
- Papercups – open-source live customer chat in Elixir
linaria
-
How we improved page load speed for Next.js ecommerce website by 1.5 times
The code duplication occurred due to disabling the default code splitting algorithm in Next.js. Previous developers used this approach to make Linaria work, which is designed to improve productivity. However, disabling code splitting led to a decrease in performance.
-
An Overview of 25+ UI Component Libraries in 2023
KumaUI : Another relatively new contender, Kuma uses zero runtime CSS-in-JS to create headless UI components which allows a lot of flexibility. It was heavily inspired by other zero runtime CSS-in-JS solutions such as PandaCSS, Vanilla Extract, and Linaria, as well as by Styled System, ChakraUI, and Native Base. ### Vue
-
Why Tailwind CSS Won
I like Linaria [0] because your IDE typechecks your styles and gives you autocomplete/intellisense when typing styles. With Tailwind you have to look everything up in docs because it's all strings, not importable constants. Leads to a lot of bugs from typos that aren't a thing with type checked styles.
[0] https://github.com/callstack/linaria
-
I've decided to go back to using the Pages Router for now (long post)
And if you're wondering why I'm not using something like Linaria or some other runtime-less CSS-in-JS tool, it's simply because I don't want to have to spend my time setting things up and working around stuff and all that jazz. I just want something that works, and I've already got a personal scaffold for getting SC to work out of the box with Next, so, right now, it's either that or sticking to CSS/SCSS/SASS. For me, that is. I know it's such a small thing, but, honestly, one less headache for me is 2 steps forward.
- What's the best option these days for CSS in JS?
-
How bad is it to use CSS-in-JS with regards to the future of React?
I know that there are solutions that generate static css files (like vanilla-extract or linaria), but neither of them work with app router currently (1, 2).
-
JSS vs Styled Components? and why?
If you really want tighter interaction with JS, try a zero-runtine solution like linaria
-
What is the best CSS framework to use with React? why?
https://github.com/callstack/linaria is objectively the best. It's 100% styled component compatible, but with zero runtime which not only makes it substantially faster, but also makes it easy to do things like server side rendering, etc.
-
Why is tailwind so hyped?
tags inside SFCs are typically injected as native
</code> tags during development to support hot updates. <strong>For production they can be extracted and merged into a single CSS file.</strong></p> </blockquote> <p>There are also 3rd party CSS libs that do the same thing such as <a href="https://linaria.dev/">linaria</a>, <a href="https://vanilla-extract.style/">vanilla-extract</a>, and <a href="https://compiledcssinjs.com/">compiled CSS</a>. Which can be used in the event you're stuck with something that doesn't have baked in support via SFC formats (looking at you React).</p> <p>These are my preferred ways of handing it.</p> <ol> <li>Tailwind</li> </ol> <p>Option 2 is tailwind, which works backwards.</p> <p>That is, instead of the above with extraction where you write the styles, and the framework or libs extract them and replace them with class names, it's the other way around.</p> <p>You're writing class names first (which are essentially aggregated CSS property-values) which then generate and/or reference styles.</p> <p>It has the advantage of being easy to write (assuming you've got editor LSP, linting, etc), but as you've discovered, it's difficult to read / can get really messy really fast.</p> <p>As far as all the other claims on the Tailwind site, it's all marketing, at least 80% bullshit.</p> </div>
- Individual css for every component?
What are some alternatives?
chatwoot - Open-source live-chat, email support, omni-channel desk. An alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬
emotion - 👩🎤 CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition
SvelteKit - web development, streamlined
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
Gotify - A simple server for sending and receiving messages in real-time per WebSocket. (Includes a sleek web-ui)
styled-components - Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅
LeapChat - Ephemeral, encrypted, in-browser chat rooms
vanilla-extract - Zero-runtime Stylesheets-in-TypeScript
LibreNews - A free and open breaking news notification platform
classnames - A simple javascript utility for conditionally joining classNames together
PushBits - A simple server for push notifications via Matrix (and a minimalistic alternative to Pushover and Gotify) 🚀📯
React CSS Modules - Seamless mapping of class names to CSS modules inside of React components.