Packagist VS PsySH

What will we do next time? Actually, the whole package is ready, and all that's left is to publish it on Packagist.

publishing our work on https://packagist.org/

The latter one is based on nix OS using Symfony flex recipes and PHP packagist composer. The flex devenv should work cross-platform on Linux, Windows, and Mac. "The main difference to other tools like Docker or a VM is that it neither uses containerization nor virtualization techniques. Instead, the services run natively on your machine."

Composer is (still) the defacto standard package manager, with the Packagist repo being the standard place to find and install libraries.

Sorta—it looks like they were most enforced by convention until May 2015, when they finally become enforced [0]. Still, that's a good one that I hadn't thought of, and they at least had the convention in place.

[0] https://github.com/composer/packagist/issues/163#issuecommen...

Scanning your image for vulnerabilities is a critical step before you deploy it to production. You can use Snyk to scan your PHP Docker image and identify and resolve vulnerabilities. The Snyk Vulnerability Database includes records for all popular operating systems and dependencies, including PHP packages published to Packagist.

No. The only linked commercial thing I know - is Nova admin panel interface lib. But you don't have to use it. (Filament or Encore are free and suitable). Modules are free ( packagist.org and gthub.com ) and you should handle them with standard composer package tool. But you need to code. It is not WordPress like CMS

Once you understand the underlying principles of a concept, you're free to find a library via packagist.org to use.

For strings I use Stringy (https://github.com/danielstjules/Stringy) for arrays I built my own Collection library, but pretty sure there are plenty in packagist (https://packagist.org/)

I guess I tried downloading a old version. and have to download a newer version of apiclient I found on https://packagist.org/packages/google/apiclient with monolog/monolog: ^2.9||^3.0. I'll try that in a second, I am away from computer now.

psysh is an interactive shell that enables developers to explore and experiment with PHP code without the need to write the source code for an entire application. It provides a simple and user-friendly shell interface where you can enter PHP code and instantly observe the results. Also, psysh is a configurable tool equipped with various plugins and modules. Therefore, you can customize it the way you want.

Tinker is a REPL built over psysh which is a general-purpose REPL for PHP. Since a Laravel application is not plain PHP and has states, databases, caches, events, and many more complex resources specific to the framework, it's not possible to interact with the application the way one would expect just using psysh.

Why choose when you can have both in one https://psysh.org/ lol... I testdrove it once, but not convinced (I think the "merged" 2-languages-in-1 is pretty funny but maybe it works for some people).

Would love to see https://psysh.org incorporated in core.

It does! Or rather it used to (and still does for some things) but looks like it broke for stdout and return value dumping a couple of years ago.

PsySH offers a dev console and interactive debugger for PHP projects. In effect, this repo creates a REPL platform for PHP developers.

psysh is a killer tool in situations like this.

And detail more on executing it: https://github.com/bobthecow/psysh/wiki/Usage

Yes, check out psysh https://psysh.org