ozzo-validation
An idiomatic Go (golang) validation package. Supports configurable and extensible validation rules (validators) using normal language constructs instead of error-prone struct tags. (by go-ozzo)
Our great sponsors
| ozzo-validation | validator | |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 1 | |
| 3,566 | 0 | |
| 1.7% | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| about 1 month ago | almost 3 years ago | |
| Go | Go | |
| MIT License | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ozzo-validation
Posts with mentions or reviews of ozzo-validation.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-06.
-
Is there any equivalent to pydantic, serde, etc?
go-ozzo/ozzo-validation
- Request Validations in Go REST API
-
Suggestion for a dynamic Struct Validation Rules
https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation Seems to do what I need but likely will need some convoluted reflection to build out the rules. Also likely some custom rules to be written which is okay since it's a one time cost and reuse in the expressions.
-
Proper validation package suggestion
Personally I use ozzo validation: https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation
-
Valgo is a type-safe, expressive, and extensible validator library for Golang.
This looks useful, but what differentiates it from something like https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation ? Why would I use Valgo over something battle tested that follows a very similar pattern?
-
Why use go over node?
This is where it gets spicy: I just don't get at all who ever though this struct-tag based validation library was a good idea https://github.com/go-playground/validator - and yet it's the most mainstream one. Try to implement your own type, you're up to register some global validation tag and repeat it every time you're using that type. I'm grateful https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation exists, that's what I use. But it's still way behind the other things I mention, where in general, it's simply not possible to pass around an invalid struct - because it can't be built if it's invalid in the first place.
-
Gin vs Echo framework
Gin comes with built-in "validation", while Echo recommends the same validator. I am also not a fan of magic struct tags, so I would probably prefer either writing my own or using something like ozzo.
-
What type of software do you write at your workplace?
Other packages of note: https://github.com/uber-go/zap https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation
-
is there any package to generate validation code for struct instead of using reflect (tags)?
Does https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation meet your requirements?
-
How do you validate your structures?
https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation/blob/v3.6.0/struct.go#L61
validator
Posts with mentions or reviews of validator.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-31.
-
How do you validate your structures?
I'm looking for a data validator and I don't like this approach where validation details are a part of tags: `validation:magic,42`. I've written my own validator but it's more like an example rather than complete implementation and it's not my particular task right now and I will be really happy to find something like that: ``go type User struct { Name stringjson:"name" Email stringjson:"email" Message stringjson:"message"` }
What are some alternatives?
When comparing ozzo-validation and validator you can also consider the following projects:
validator - :100:Go Struct and Field validation, including Cross Field, Cross Struct, Map, Slice and Array diving
Password validator library for Go - Flexible and customizable password validation
govalidator - [Go] Package of validators and sanitizers for strings, numerics, slices and structs
Validate - ⚔ Go package for data validation and filtering. support Map, Struct, Form data. Go通用的数据验证与过滤库，使用简单，内置大部分常用验证、过滤器，支持自定义验证器、自定义消息、字段翻译。
protoc-gen-validate - Protocol Buffer Validation - Being replaced by github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate
postcode - Small Golang package for validating postal codes
govalid - Struct validation using tags
checkdigit - Provide check digit algorithms and calculators written in Go
jio - jio is a json schema validator similar to joi
gqlgen - go generate based graphql server library
Handy Go utilities - GO Golang Utilities and helpers like validators and string formatters
ozzo-validation vs validator
validator vs validator
ozzo-validation vs Password validator library for Go
ozzo-validation vs govalidator
ozzo-validation vs Validate
ozzo-validation vs protoc-gen-validate
ozzo-validation vs postcode
ozzo-validation vs govalid
ozzo-validation vs checkdigit
ozzo-validation vs jio
ozzo-validation vs gqlgen
ozzo-validation vs Handy Go utilities