ozzo-validation
ozzo-routing
Our great sponsors
| ozzo-validation | ozzo-routing | |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 1 | |
| 3,551 | 447 | |
| 1.2% | 0.0% | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 26 days ago | almost 2 years ago | |
| Go | Go | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ozzo-validation
-
Is there any equivalent to pydantic, serde, etc?
go-ozzo/ozzo-validation
- Request Validations in Go REST API
-
Suggestion for a dynamic Struct Validation Rules
https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation Seems to do what I need but likely will need some convoluted reflection to build out the rules. Also likely some custom rules to be written which is okay since it's a one time cost and reuse in the expressions.
-
Proper validation package suggestion
Personally I use ozzo validation: https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation
-
Valgo is a type-safe, expressive, and extensible validator library for Golang.
This looks useful, but what differentiates it from something like https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation ? Why would I use Valgo over something battle tested that follows a very similar pattern?
-
Why use go over node?
This is where it gets spicy: I just don't get at all who ever though this struct-tag based validation library was a good idea https://github.com/go-playground/validator - and yet it's the most mainstream one. Try to implement your own type, you're up to register some global validation tag and repeat it every time you're using that type. I'm grateful https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation exists, that's what I use. But it's still way behind the other things I mention, where in general, it's simply not possible to pass around an invalid struct - because it can't be built if it's invalid in the first place.
-
Gin vs Echo framework
Gin comes with built-in "validation", while Echo recommends the same validator. I am also not a fan of magic struct tags, so I would probably prefer either writing my own or using something like ozzo.
-
What type of software do you write at your workplace?
Other packages of note: https://github.com/uber-go/zap https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation
-
is there any package to generate validation code for struct instead of using reflect (tags)?
Does https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation meet your requirements?
-
How do you validate your structures?
Have you looked at this library?
ozzo-routing
-
Implemented a bench marker to compare Go's HTTP Router
go-ozzo/ozzo-routing
What are some alternatives?
validator - :100:Go Struct and Field validation, including Cross Field, Cross Struct, Map, Slice and Array diving
Password validator library for Go - Flexible and customizable password validation
govalidator - [Go] Package of validators and sanitizers for strings, numerics, slices and structs
Validate - ⚔ Go package for data validation and filtering. support Map, Struct, Form data. Go通用的数据验证与过滤库，使用简单，内置大部分常用验证、过滤器，支持自定义验证器、自定义消息、字段翻译。
protoc-gen-validate - Protocol Buffer Validation - Being replaced by github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate
mux - A powerful HTTP router and URL matcher for building Go web servers with 🦍
GoSwagger - Swagger 2.0 implementation for go
postcode - Small Golang package for validating postal codes
Gin - Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin.
Echo - High performance, minimalist Go web framework
govalid - Struct validation using tags
Iris - The fastest HTTP/2 Go Web Framework. New, modern and easy to learn. Fast development with Code you control. Unbeatable cost-performance ratio :rocket: