otomi-core VS rules_gitops

Compare otomi-core vs rules_gitops and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
otomi-core rules_gitops
75 1
2,136 156
1.4% 3.2%
9.6 4.2
1 day ago 2 days ago
Mustache Starlark
Apache License 2.0 Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

otomi-core

Posts with mentions or reviews of otomi-core. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-25.

rules_gitops

Posts with mentions or reviews of rules_gitops. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-07.
  • “You don't need this overengineered goo for your project.”
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Sep 2021
    > “You don't need this overengineered goo for your project.”

    k8s is probably a great excuse to think how to compose your infrastructure and software in a declarative way - I'm still fascinated by https://demo.kubevious.io/ - It just made "click" when playing with that demo - it's not goo it's a different operating system and a different mindset.

    You can do 80% with docker-compose / swarm for small projects but:

    If you read HN you are in a huge bubble - gruelsome patched tomcat7 apps on Java8 with 20 properties/ini/xml config files are still popular - hosting things in docker or doing ci/cd is still not mainstream. At least in Europe in the public sector stuff where I was involved.

    Sure you can mock it - but the declarative approach is powerful - if you can pull it off to have it across all your infrastructure and code with ci/cd and tests you are fast.

    This alone correctly implemented https://github.com/adobe/rules_gitops solves so many problems I can't count the useless meetings we had over any of these bullet points, bazel alone would have solved most major pain points in that project. Just by beeing explizit and declarative.

    Don't believe the hype but it's a powerful weapon.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing otomi-core and rules_gitops you can also consider the following projects:

k3os - Purpose-built OS for Kubernetes, fully managed by Kubernetes.

rules_docker - Rules for building and handling Docker images with Bazel

charts - TrueNAS SCALE Apps Catalogs & Charts

kpt - Automate Kubernetes Configuration Editing

k8s-gitops - GitOps principles to define kubernetes cluster state via code

Nomad - Nomad is an easy-to-use, flexible, and performant workload orchestrator that can deploy a mix of microservice, batch, containerized, and non-containerized applications. Nomad is easy to operate and scale and has native Consul and Vault integrations.

quickstart - Quickstarts to provision Kubernetes with Otomi

redis-operator - Redis Operator for Kubernetes

ingress-nginx - Ingress-NGINX Controller for Kubernetes

Entity Framework - EF Core is a modern object-database mapper for .NET. It supports LINQ queries, change tracking, updates, and schema migrations.

helm-charts - Temporal Helm charts

werf - A solution for implementing efficient and consistent software delivery to Kubernetes facilitating best practices.