ormolu VS hoogle

I have a similar example based on Ormolu live. I wonder if there are any libraries being developed to send data back and forth?

You will also need a formatter that uses that style. Brittany for example. The default formattingProvider for HLS is ormolu, which I believe doesn't use this style, so you will have to change this setting.

Turns out I prefer Brittany to Ormolu, I edited it so it hopefully looks less verbose all on one line

For code formatting ormolu is a good option

Ideally like this: https://zio.dev/reference/#concurrency

Or this: https://hoogle.haskell.org/?hoogle=fork

{ "customLocalFormatters.formatters": [ { "command": "make format", "languages": ["haskell"] } ], "emeraldwalk.runonsave": { "commands": [ { "match": "*.hs", "isAsync": true, "cmd": "make retag retag_file=${file}" } ] }, "ghcid.command": "make ghcid", "goto-documentation.customDocs": { "hs": "https://hoogle.haskell.org/?hoogle=${query}" } }

You had a look at Hoogle?

https://hoogle.haskell.org/

For some type signatures there is (are) only one (or only a few) meaningful implementation(s).

I'm in the middle on operators. I like being able to define my own, but I understand how it's challenging to figure out what the hieroglyphics mean when you're not familiar with them. https://hoogle.haskell.org/ can be a help here

> In something like Haskell I need to know upfront what I may do with some "object". The IDE can't help me discover the methods I need. All it can do is to show me all available functions in scope.

Sorry, but this just isn't true. Hoogle <https://hoogle.haskell.org/> searches function by type, fuzzily: ask for functions whose first parameter is the type of the object-like thing, and you'll get just what you're looking for. And it's perfectly possible to run hoogle locally and integrate it with your editor.

Now, the tooling for a language like Java have had several centuries more of aggregate development work done on them compared to Haskell's tools, and if that polish is a difference-maker for you, that's fine! But it's not a fundamental limitation, and claiming it is is just fud.

In my perusals into the Haskell ecosystem, discovering Hoogle[1] was definitely a revelation on the power of a strongly-typed language. Sometimes, you know the _shape_ of the thing you are looking for, but not the name. The ability to search a repository of packages for all functions conforming to a certain type signature (e.g., (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) is a superpower.

[1] https://hoogle.haskell.org/

which is quite a bit more readable. You can even search Hoogle for x -> HashMap x y -> y and find it, try it!

https://hoogle.haskell.org/?hoogle=x%20-%3E%20HashMap%20x%20...

Haskell has hoogle, which searches Hackage for functions matching names, type signatures, etc.

Hello, I am wondering if there is something like https://hoogle.haskell.org for the rust language.