organice
orgdown
Our great sponsors
organice | orgdown | |
---|---|---|
84 | 60 | |
2,337 | - | |
1.2% | - | |
6.7 | - | |
4 months ago | - | |
JavaScript | ||
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
organice
-
Ask HN: Self-hosted alternative to Apple Notes?
With organice you can host your notes on Gitlab for free and the backend becomes "git". You get web apps for Windows, iOS and Android.
https://organice.200ok.ch/
-
Notes on Emacs Org Mode
Sorry, but _what exactly_ «it seems to do» from your point of view?
My «second brain» now is almost 300Mb of text, pictures, sound files, PDF and other stuff. As I already mentioned, it contains tables, mathematical formulae, sheet music, cross-references, code samples, UML diagrams and graphs in Graphviz format. It is versioned, indexed by local search engine, analyzed by AI assistant and shared between many computers and mobile devices. And (last but not least) it works: it allows me to solve my tasks way more faster than with the assistant of external, non-personalized tools (like ChatGPT, StackExchange or Google).
I know no tools for all this tasks except org-mode. Well, maybe Evernote in the 2010-s was something similar — but with less features, with more bugs and with worse interface.
Personal note-taking _is_ a complex task per se (well, at least for someone like typical HN visitor). I've seen many note-taking tools, that were ridiculously featureless, stupid and inconvenient because they were _not_ complex enough.
> Sure if one wants to do emacs-gardening it is fine.
1)You can use org-mode outside Emacs. See for example Logseq (https://logseq.com/), organice (https://organice.200ok.ch/) or EasyOrg.
2)Org-mode works in Emacs out of the box, you don't need any «emacs-gardening» to use org-mode.
3)The term «Emacs-gardening» itself sound a bit like hate-speech for me. The complexity of Emacs customization is overrated, mostly due to opinions of people who never used Emacs or used it in the previous millennium.
- Let's write an Emacs treesitter major mode
-
Is there any app or site with org-mode syntax live-preview?
organice?
- Quick recap of the state of Org mode apps for Android
-
How do you take efficient notes?
organice is a user friendly, cloud backed up, lightweight front end to orgmode (or based on).
https://organice.200ok.ch/
-
Orgmode is amazing
organice is a more active fork of org-web that can also sync with GitLab or WebDAV. I'm currently syncing it with my personal Nextcloud server.
-
Should I use Vscode org mode or emacs org mode
If you just need the basic syntax highlighting provided by the VS Code plugin then use that. If you want the full power of org mode then go with Emacs. If you want something in between then maybe EasyOrg https://easyorgmode.com/ or Organice https://github.com/200ok-ch/organice will do.
- What can orgmode do that notion or obsidian can’t
-
Org-Mode suggestions for tablets/mobile devices
You could try “organice”: https://github.com/200ok-ch/organice , it runs on any browser including Mobile Safari, so it should work on iPads. I haven’t tried it on Android nor Android-based tablets. It does work on iPhone.
orgdown
- Orgdown – A lightweight markup language similar to Markdown
-
Notes on Emacs Org Mode
There are two reasons why I call Org mode standardized.
> I imagine there aren't really various flavors of Org Mode, but that doesn't make it standardized.
All the implementations that call themselves org-mode follow the conventions set by the canonical implementation - the Emacs org-mode. While this may not sound like a good reason to call it standardized, the practical implication is a vast difference from what you get with various markdown flavors. In the latter case, the only way to make sure that your markdown is correct, is to test it with the target implementation.
The second reason is that there is an actual effort to standardize org-mode - called Orgdown [1]. Org-mode is already more or less uniform across implementations. This effort tries to write it down as a reference. Markdown has a similar effort called CommonMark. But if you want to know why it's different, you have to look at the history of why it isn't called 'Standard Markdown'.
[1] https://gitlab.com/publicvoit/orgdown
-
How to combine daily journal with general database of people, places, things, etc.
And yes, at least my setup fulfills all of your requirements and much more. For starters, I can add tags, date- and timestamps everywhere, generate "agenda" views for days/weeks/months/... which collects all those time-related items and visualizes them, I can link emails/urls/... and links to files which I tag as well, I can search through search strings or regex to find meta-data on files/notes/events/... and it's all in the most versatile file format possible: plain UTF-8 text files containing simple orgdown syntax, the most beautifully designed lightweight markup language (LML) there is IMHO.
-
orgmunge: A Python package to read, modify and write an Org tree
Are you aware of orgdown?
-
Reading org files.
If you want to parse Orgdown files yourself, expect to invest some time in setting up a testing environment.
-
Self hosted cross platform notes application
I think we've got a misunderstanding here. Text files (in this case in orgdown syntax format) are files that contain the information in its original form: characters, words, sentences. So you only need a software that lets you open a text file to view it. If you want to modify the information stored in the text files, you need an application that lets you modify text files. In case of orgdown, you can find options on https://gitlab.com/publicvoit/orgdown/-/blob/master/doc/Tool-Support.org or choose any non-syntax-specific editor of your choice.
-
Markdown to orgmode without breaking links?
So the links are working in Markdown? So Markdown-export is working and your issue starts with the conversion from Markdown to Orgdown?
-
Whats the big thing with org mode?
Well, the difference is that Orgdown, the syntax of Org mode for GNU Emacs is a Lightweight markup language while HTML is a more complex markup language.
-
Note Taking on Emacs vs Other applications
Since your notes are in orgdown format, you may use any compatible app that understands to read and probably write orgdown. One of them is GNU Emacs with its org-mode.
-
Wanted: A nice looking recent file dialog
I'm thinking of a screen that pops up when booting Emacs that only shows the files I was working on recently in large font (maybe as buttons to click on). The file extension should be hidden, so that I may use it with Orgdown files that have long, descriptive file names (most probably within the same directory).
What are some alternatives?
org-roam - Rudimentary Roam replica with Org-mode
zonote - Cross-platform desktop note-taking app. Sticky notes with Markdown and Tabs. All in one .txt file.
orgzly-android - Outliner for taking notes and managing to-do lists
github-orgmode-tests - This is a test project where you can explore how github interprets Org-mode files
org-web-tools - View, capture, and archive Web pages in Org-mode
logseq - A local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. Use it to organize your todo list, to write your journals, or to record your unique life.
SingleFileZ - Web Extension to save a faithful copy of an entire web page in a self-extracting ZIP file
orgmode - Orgmode clone written in Lua for Neovim 0.9+.
tft-interop - data interoperability across tools for thought
org-web - org-mode on the web, built with React, optimized for mobile, synced with Dropbox and Google Drive
zettelkasten-mode - Zettelkasten note-taking for org-mode