org-parser
zim-desktop-wiki
Our great sponsors
org-parser | zim-desktop-wiki | |
---|---|---|
15 | 163 | |
306 | 1,848 | |
0.7% | 0.9% | |
0.0 | 8.4 | |
10 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Clojure | Python | |
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
org-parser
-
Let's Help Org Mode Escape from Emacs
Let me start by saying I like the goal and would like to see org mode accessible to everyone, but I do have some thoughts/reservations.
> For the little code I do write, I find having AI assistance (via CoPilot or Cody) to be tremendously helpful. So helpful, in fact, that I now tend to jump into VSCode for actual coding,
Aren't there both copilot and Cody plugins available in emacs?
> Use VSCode for everything. For me, this requires a full-featured org mode implementation. I currently feel stuck in Emacs just because of how great org mode is.
This seems much more difficult than creating plugins you need in emacs and with the downside that customization will be much worse in vscode, especially customization of behavior with things like hooks.
> Letting go of bug-for-bug compatibility with Emacs as a goal. Let's let the quirky behavior die off and move forward with a more cohesive program, even if it looks a little bit different.
If you don't have compatibility, then you aren't really implementing org-mode... you are starting fresh.
That's okay, but you'll likely annoy org-mode users and developers as documents ending in `.org` start not working the same.
Also there are languages besides Rust and Haskell that have an org parser implementation. For instance one written in Javascript already has a spec as you explain it and is used in production for organice[0]:
> Why is this project useful / Rationale
> Org mode in Emacs is implemented in org-element.el (API documentation). The spec for the Org syntax is written in prose. - https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser
> Portable. It should not be difficult to get this integrated into any editor.
This tells me you already have a language in mind such as Lua (can't think of any other easy to integrate languages)? I'd argue that's not very popular either though.
-
Web assembly version of org-mode?
I mean , you have parsers for JS and CLJS https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser
- EBNF grammar for Org syntax
-
Organice: An implementation of Org mode without the dependency of Emacs
I don't think you did. You probably used the sister project https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser which has a well known issue regarding what you are describing: https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser/issues/56
organice has no such performance issues (and does not run on the JVM). I use it daily with 5k LOC files.
-
Tree-sitter grammar for org-mode
EBNF grammar - https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser/blob/master/resources...
From the readme:
> Org grammar for tree-sitter. It is not meant to implement emacs' orgmode parser, but to implement a grammar that can usefully parse org files to be used in neovim and any library that uses tree-sitter parsers.
This grammar is in active development and is being used by nvim-orgmode/orgmode [1], a org-mode neovim plugin.
Some additional resources some might find useful:
* Org Syntax - https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html
* EBNF grammar - https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser/blob/master/resources...
-
Show HN: A plain-text file format for todos and check lists
There's at least a parser using that as a spec at https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser
-
Formal Specification and Programmatic Parser for Org-mode
We have an issue with more information and we are working on it: https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser/issues/56
-
How to turn ORG into SXML?
If you’re open to use a different Lisp, then maybe https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser is something for you.
-
The open calendar, task and note space is a mess
I just wanted to chime in and mention that the folks who wrote organice[0] also came up with an EBNF grammar[1] for org-mode. Also of tangential interest is that work is actively being done on creating a tree-sitter version[2] of the grammar, although that work is not public (yet).
[0] https://github.com/200ok-ch/organice
[1] https://github.com/200ok-ch/org-parser/blob/master/resources...
[2] https://github.com/kristijanhusak/orgmode.nvim/issues/31#iss...
zim-desktop-wiki
-
Show HN: A Python-based static site generator using Jinja templates
I'll slightly modify your argument; because Pure HTML does suck:
Why don't people make static sites with a simple "Markdown-or-Similar to HTML" converter, CSS, and vanilla JS...etc?
(This is what I do, btw -- http://zim-wiki.org + a template)
- Zim – A Desktop Wiki
-
Show HN: A directory of open source alternatives to proprietary software
You should add Zim [1] to the "Personal Knowledge Management" section :)
-
Sent – simple plaintext presentation tool
https://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/s5/
And I just tweaked the CSS and added a bit of logic to included the possibility of one image per slide; as well as editing slides not with raw HTML but with https://zim-wiki.org (because that's what I'm really used to, I'm sure any Markdown thing would work just as well).
-
The rise and fall of the standard user interface
Absolutely; recently I realize I wish I'd never learned vim. I use too many other programs that are at least CUA-ish ( http://zim-wiki.org is the most important app I use ) and now I kind of want out. I haven't yet tried Modeless Vim, but that looks like my next experiment.
- Zed is now open source
-
Writing HTML in HTML
It is so hard not to feel REALLY SMUG reading stuff like this, as someone who has run my own website as the working primary source for my college instruction for the past 15 years or so using https://zim-wiki.org. (before Markdown was much of a thing!)
It's borderline bizarre to have watched this method of doing things kind of die out, and then also come back in the form of "static site generators" -- which, frankly, are still way clunkier than this.
Write in Zim, export to html, rsync to site. Easy.
- Note-apps =HELL
- Ask HN: What are some unpopular technologies you wish people knew more about?
-
The complex simplicity of my static websites
FWIW, I've been using http://zim-wiki.org for YEARS. (Sites a little messy and I need to clean it up, but it's extremely functional,) I host my college classes websites from it, to the point that I forced myself to learn the Canvas API, to just clone the page from this site to the front page of Canvas and change the links so they come back here.
jrm4.com
What are some alternatives?
org-caldav - Caldav sync for Emacs orgmode
obsidian-mind-map - An Obsidian plugin for displaying markdown notes as mind maps using Markmap.
organice - An implementation of Org mode without the dependency of Emacs - built for mobile and desktop browsers
vimwiki - Personal Wiki for Vim
Etar Calendar - Android open source calendar
Joplin - Joplin - the secure note taking and to-do app with synchronisation capabilities for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.
tree-sitter-org - Org grammar for tree-sitter
logseq - A local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. Use it to organize your todo list, to write your journals, or to record your unique life.
obsidian-dataview - A data index and query language over Markdown files, for https://obsidian.md/.
org-ql - A searching tool for Org-mode, including custom query languages, commands, saved searches and agenda-like views, etc.
Trilium Notes - Build your personal knowledge base with Trilium Notes