|6 days ago||4 months ago|
|Apache License 2.0||The Unlicense|
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Installing Python in Ubuntu 20.04
2 projects | dev.to | 1 Dec 2021
build-essential installs everything required for compiling basic software written in C and C++ in this case Python. Read more... zlib1g-devis the development package of the compression library that implements the deflate compression methods and essential in Python's installation and other installations as well. Read more... libncurses5-dev is the development package for the curses library that provides a terminal-independent screen-painting and keyboard-handling tool. Read more... libgdbm-dev is a development library for GDBM whose functionality is to store key/data pairs in a data file. Read more... libnss3-dev Read more... libssl-dev Read more... libreadline-dev Read more... libffi-dev Read more... libsqlite3-dev Read more... wget Read more... libbz2-dev Read more... In the next step we can either manually download the latest release of Python from the Python Official Release page or use wget which we have installed in previous command. To download using wget, paste the following command in the terminal to download Python in the computer.
Trouble integrating OpenSSL library
1 project | reddit.com/r/C_Programming | 20 Nov 2021
Has anyone successfully integrated OpenSSL library? I am having trouble compiling the master branch (as well as the 1_1_1 stable. With the master, I include the path //ssl/openssl/include in my Makefile but I see the following missing file error
Alpine Linux: Considering LibreSSL as default OpenSSL provider again
Ariadne actually answers this in that thread: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/16660#issuecomment...
I'll quote the section:
"Given that the OpenSSL 3 migration had an outcome where our contingency plan came into effect, I believe it to be the most prudent course of action to evaluate all possible options before committing to trying the OpenSSL 3 migration again, such an evaluation would be required by the TSC anyway."
The Alpine project operates independently from OpenSSL, so it's no surprise they published their own report to discuss their own timelines. I'm not sure I can attest to this being a "personal" reaction from my interpretation. Instead, this seems rather like the Alpine project's reaction to their own internal deadlines. Tossing out OpenSSL may appear flippant from a distance, but getting SSL correct for their own releases and finding projects that want to work alongside them (as LibreSSL is supposedly responsive towards doing) should be a priority if you're in charge of getting this work ticket over the line.
Of course, the wording and general attitude towards OpenSSL developers can be interpreted however you want, but I don't see this as outright hostility or a personal reaction so much as "this ticket was left for over a month, and our project needs to make forward progress."
Ehh, it doesn't seem very hasty to me. The proposal is for Alpine 3.17 or 3.18, which are 1 and 1.5 years away respectively. That's plenty of time to consider the pros and cons, try it, and revert if it ends up being a poor choice.
> Seems like this stems from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/16660 which contains the full backstory and some more information.
I wouldn't call that the "full backstory", since it is only about a single issue outlined in this proposal. Though she does explain that fact in that GitHub thread too, and also why they're looking into alternatives:
> Given that the OpenSSL 3 migration had an outcome where our contingency plan came into effect, I believe it to be the most prudent course of action to evaluate all possible options before committing to trying the OpenSSL 3 migration again, such an evaluation would be required by the TSC anyway.
> and instead the author chose to write on Twitter and in AlpineLinux GitLab about the frustrations.
Eh, I wouldn't read too much into short twitter vents. As for the Alpine Linux GitLab, well, she's the head of Alpine's security team and a member of the TSC, so coming up with proposals as for what should be investigated w.r.t. security critical packages is one of the things she's supposed to be doing.
Seems like this stems from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/16660 which contains the full backstory and some more information.
kaniini, same as Ariadne Conill who posted the issue in the linked GitLab instance, opened a issue about a regression. They felt the response from the OpenSSL team wasn't as fast as expected, and created the text that this submission is linking to.
Seems expectations of a quick fix was never told about in the GitHub repository for OpenSSL, and instead the author chose to write on Twitter and in AlpineLinux GitLab about the frustrations.
I can't help but to see this as a personal reaction to these events, and unsure about the merit to change it out so hastily. But, I'm not super up-to-date about things in LibreSSL/OpenSSL land so I could be wrong, it has happened before.
OpenSSL Is Implementing QUIC
1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 14 Oct 2021
Is using libraries "cheating" yourself?
3 projects | reddit.com/r/learnprogramming | 12 Oct 2021
What we learn from twitch source code leak
1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Oct 2021
I mean, it hasn't grown to a thousand entries, but https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/http/h...
TIL: There's a guy who is responsible for maintaining the database of time zones which computers and operating systems use to configure locales. His name is Paul Eggert. And he's a computer scientist based in California.
2 projects | reddit.com/r/todayilearned | 2 Oct 2021
It wasn't made by a single guy. OpenSSL was forked from SSLeay that was made by 2 guys (Eric Andrew Young and Tim Hudson) and they maintained it for a few years. There seem to be 3 developers (Richard Levitte, Stephen Henson, Andy Polyakov) who have contributed for 23 years straight according to the contribution graphs.
The difference between Go and Rust
6 projects | reddit.com/r/programming | 28 Sep 2021
And yet they all do https://github.com/openssl/openssl/tree/1c0eede9827b0962f1d752fa4ab5d436fa039da4/crypto/aes/asm
What is the difference between sha512 and sha512_256?
1 project | reddit.com/r/cryptography | 24 Apr 2021
The open source library libtomcrypto has two separate implementations of sha512. What is the difference between these implementations? Which is the version that would be most typically used?
Single File sha256 Library from Git
3 projects | reddit.com/r/C_Programming | 15 Apr 2021
80 projects | dev.to | 27 Feb 2021
libtomcrypt - Fairly comprehensive, modular and portable cryptographic toolkit. Public domain.
What are some alternatives?
GnuTLS - GnuTLS
LibreSSL - LibreSSL Portable itself. This includes the build scaffold and compatibility layer that builds portable LibreSSL from the OpenBSD source code. Pull requests or patches sent to [email protected] are welcome.
mbedTLS - An open source, portable, easy to use, readable and flexible SSL library
Crypto++ - free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
libsodium - A modern, portable, easy to use crypto library.
Botan - Cryptography Toolkit
cfssl - CFSSL: Cloudflare's PKI and TLS toolkit
Bcrypt - Modern(-ish) password hashing for your software and your servers
GnuPG - Mirror of git://git.gnupg.org/gnupg.git — master branch contains no changes from upstream.
s2n - s2n : an implementation of the TLS/SSL protocols