opensea-js VS openzeppelin-contracts

We will create a web app that will let users mint a NFT in one click: creating an AI art from a prompt, storing it on IPFS and mint the unique NFT in Polygon so you can see it on OpenSea. Pretty cool right ?

OS: https://opensea.io /Keyframes/collected

It's peculiar considering it works fine for most games (R6S, GTAV, LoL, Valorant) but it's these odd situations that makes just light browsing a huge pain. An example I can think of where this is an issue is opensea.io where any animated sections cause my browser to lag until i navigate away from the content.

Some classic phishing attempts are fake e-mails from scammers pretending they are part of Opensea, Binance, Metamask, or individuals messaging you on Telegram, Discord, or Twitter pretending they are part of a team or interested to buy your assets in different means than through the trustable marketplaces.

Bulk Transfers and Collection Trading: The introduction of token-bound accounts enables the trading of entire NFT collections as a single unit. Platforms like OpenSea can leverage this functionality to facilitate bulk transfers of NFTs, streamlining collection management for both creators and collectors.

download metamask app, copy your secret recovery phrase and paste in metamask, then set up password, go to browser, type "opensea.io", then connect wallet, then profile!!

After manually flipping some bits, I'm pretty sure that the first part is meant to be https://opensea.io/

Smart contracts which deal with minting, listing, buying, selling, collecting, and viewing NFTs are called NFT smart contracts. NFTs are non-fungible tokens, which means these are some digital art, music, photographs, etc. which are up for sale digitally and are unique in the world. The biggest digital art (NFTs) market is Opensea. I will also be posting an article where I will create an NFT marketplace dApp from scratch soon.

Lets look the events of Open Zeppelin’s ERC20 token contract:

ERC-777 is difficult to implement properly, due to its susceptibility to different forms of attack(opens in a new tab). It is recommended to use ERC-20 instead. This page remains as a historical archive.

This depends if you're writing a contract from scratch or using existing code. If you're making something new, then yes (recommend not to use THE most recent available, always better to go with tried and tested). For existing projects, never try to override the solidity version. This may be a pain with "@" imports - ideally everyone should specify the library version (e.g. https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/v2.5.1/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol).