OpenAFS VS telepythy

Compare OpenAFS vs telepythy and see what are their differences.

OpenAFS

Fork of OpenAFS from git.openafs.org for visualization (by openafs)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
OpenAFS telepythy
4 1
76 13
- -
8.2 5.6
2 days ago 3 months ago
C Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

OpenAFS

Posts with mentions or reviews of OpenAFS. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-18.

telepythy

Posts with mentions or reviews of telepythy. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-18.
  • Outrun: Execute local command using processing power of another Linux machine
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 18 Mar 2021
    Hmm interesting idea. I was working on something a couple weeks ago after all the "αcτµαlly pδrταblε εxεcµταblε" stuff. My idea was to be able to run local programs like your favorite fancy shell, but on a remote machine or container that does not have it installed (think lightweight containers you need to work in). The idea was to have a parent program that runs your shell or other client program using ptrace to intercept and proxy all syscalls to a small client on the remote machine/container. So the code would be running locally, but all of the syscalls would be running remotely. I actually got it somewhat working but gave up when I realized that the difficulty in memory and file access. Files in particular were hard since I couldn't disambiguate if a file access was for a "local" or "remote" file. Also in the past I did something silmilar for python programs https://github.com/seiferteric/telepythy

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenAFS and telepythy you can also consider the following projects:

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform

rffmpeg - rffmpeg: remote SSH FFmpeg wrapper tool

GlusterFS - Web Content for gluster.org -- Deprecated as of September 2017

outrun - Execute a local command using the processing power of another Linux machine.

GlusterFS - Gluster Filesystem : Build your distributed storage in minutes

llama

Apache Hadoop - Apache Hadoop

XtreemFS - Distributed Fault-Tolerant File System

SheepDog - Distributed Storage System for QEMU

rozofs - Scale-out storage using erasure coding

Seaweed File System - SeaweedFS is a fast distributed storage system for blobs, objects, files, and data lake, for billions of files! Blob store has O(1) disk seek, cloud tiering. Filer supports Cloud Drive, cross-DC active-active replication, Kubernetes, POSIX FUSE mount, S3 API, S3 Gateway, Hadoop, WebDAV, encryption, Erasure Coding. [Moved to: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs]

Tahoe-LAFS - The Tahoe-LAFS decentralized secure filesystem.