OPA (Open Policy Agent) VS Ory Kratos

How can we handle this? Are there any mechanisms to prevent or at least to some extent safeguard this kind of issues without falling back to a manual workflow? There is. One huge advantage of sticking to (de-facto) standards like Terraform is that first we are probably not the first ones to come up with this question and second there is a huge ecosystem around Terraform that might help us with such challenges. And for this specific scenario the solution is the Open Policy Agent. Let us take a closer look how the solution could look like.

A popular Policy-as-Code tool for Terraform is OPA, everyone's favorite versatile open-source policy engine that enforces security and compliance policies across your cloud-native stack, making it easier to manage and maintain consistent policy enforcement in complex, multi-service environments.

Harness Policy As Code uses Open Policy Agent (OPA) as the central service to store and enforce policies for the different entities and processes across the Harness platform. In this section, you will define a policy that will deny a pipeline execution if there is no approval step defined in a deployment stage.

OPA: While OPA is an open-source, general-purpose policy engine capable of enforcing unified and context-aware policies throughout the stack, it can also accept and output data in formats such as JSON, effectively functioning as a tool for generating or modifying configurations. Although it does not provide out-of-the-box schema definition support, it allows the integration of JsonSchema definitions.

In essence, container image signing involves adding a digital stamp to an image, affirming its authenticity. This digital assurance guarantees that the image is unchanged from creation to deployment. In this blog, I'll explain how to sign container images for Kubernetes using Cosign and the Open Policy Agent. I will also share a tutorial that demonstrates these concepts.

In this post we will explores two powerful solutions for addressing this issue: the Open Policy Language (OPA) and Google’s Zanzibar.

Now there are more subdivided practice: * Policy as Code: Sentinel, OPA * Database as Code: bytebase * AppConfiguration as Code: KusionStack, Acorn * ...... (Welcome to add more)

CIAM is not nearly as popular of a term as it needs to be. When most developers build apps today, they still look at their cloud provider's IAM or Active Directory for inspiration in design of their customer-facing systems. I think this article is actually understating the complexity. Conway's Law rules all and sometimes your systems and users won't even necessarily be in your control. I urge folks to look into policy engines like OPA[0] and ReBAC systems like SpiceDB[1] rather than reinventing the wrong wheel.

[0]: https://www.openpolicyagent.org

[1]: https://github.com/authzed/spicedb

I was expecting hydra / kratos to show up as an alternative.. but did not see any. Does any have any experience, good or bad about it?

https://github.com/ory/kratos

I think it would be fair to say that kratos was not the priority in 2022 in terms of code you can see not much was commited (https://github.com/ory/kratos/graphs/code-frequency) so I might have had a bad first impression.

A few issues on kratos that I consider relatively important are still missing / nobody from Ory is giving their input so it's hard to make progress and I would not take my time to contribute if I dont know if the owner are going to merge it.

An example that comes to mind is the OAuth email auto-verification or the search of users that is still super basic (we only recently got the filter of identifiers).

Sorry to hear that this has been your experience! What exactly was the issue for you? It’s true that there are lots of open PRs. We’re a small team and often busy with customer requirements which doesn’t allow us to get a some community PRs over the finishing line.

Sometimes, PRs are also not aligning with an architecture or API concept which is when they often go stale.

Saying that the open source is second class is a false accusation in my view:

- Over 1500 PRs merged in Ory Kratos alone: https://github.com/ory/kratos/pulls

Check out the milestone on github: https://github.com/ory/kratos/milestone/15

not sure if that is everything.

An open source solution pre-built from professionals like Ory Kratos or Keycloak saves you a lot of time and pain.

https://github.com/ory/kratos

One might say you wouldn't be surprised. Security practices at start ups have never been good (no regulation, focus on sales) but to see this lack of security awareness in a company protecting PII is shocking. But what do VCs know ...

As always when something like this happens, here are some good open source alternatives with appropriate security policies and bug bounties in place:

* https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak

* https://github.com/ory/kratos

* https://github.com/GluuFederation (potentially dated for some use cases)