onedrive
git-lfs
Our great sponsors
onedrive | git-lfs | |
---|---|---|
169 | 159 | |
9,250 | 12,443 | |
- | 1.5% | |
6.5 | 9.1 | |
7 days ago | 4 days ago | |
D | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
onedrive
-
Winlator: Android app that lets you to run Windows apps with Wine
here's a hunch assuming you tried the below client:
https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive/blob/1a88d33be3e2c6747...
try changing that to e.g. the android (or windows) onedrive client's id.
this trick works for exchange (allowing third-party mail clients).
-
Killing Windows 10 in 2025 could turn PCs into eWaste
Syncthing might fit the bill, or just keep using Onedrive: https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive
-
Using MS OneDrive(r) on Debian 12 -- but .deb packages only for Deb 10/11
I first started with this onedrive client https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive (+ the GUI package) and got it working fine, but it seems like a sync all-or-nothing deal.
-
Microsoft Office and Linux - One more option
Source: https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive
-
Finally made the switch to Linux Mint as a life long windows user. Also working on degoogling my life.
You could check out https://abraunegg.github.io/, I use that for syncing with my OneDrive.
-
Linux user to SharePoint/onedrive?
* Via the OneDrive Client for Linux - https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive - this 'syncs' your data, bi-directional operation, open source and free. Supports Personal, Business & SharePoint account types and Shared Folders. A Docker container is also available for all major architectures (x86_64, ARMHF, AARCH64). If you need a GUI for onedrive client management use: https://github.com/bpozdena/OneDriveGUI
- OneDrive on Linux Requires Admin Approval - Workarounds?
-
OneDrive Requires Admin Approval - Workarounds?
I have used an app called, appropriately, onedrive. The git repository and info is here. Once you connect to OneDrive (not hard to do at all) you can do anything in the folder and when you start the command from the CLI it will sync the files to your account and update the files on the server. There are a few custom options you can set to streamline. I used it for a long time syncing with Windows and it works great.
-
omv onedrive plugin
The client itself is 100% stable and functional enough for your use-case. To read up on the client, please visit: https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive
- How feasible is to change from Windows in my case?
git-lfs
-
Git-annex: manage large files in Git without storing the contents in Git
What's the difference between this and Git-LFS?
https://git-lfs.com/
- Twenty Years Is Nothing
-
Aho – a Git implementation in Awk
It doesn't, since Git's data model has to be changed to content-defined chunks to solve the issue.
You should look at git-lfs[1] instead.
[1] https://git-lfs.com
-
Launch HN: Diversion (YC S22) – Cloud-Native Git Alternative
Congrats on the HN launch. How does this improve or expand or blow git-lfs[1] out of the water because if I needed large blob file support it's what I would use instead. It offers pointers to the big files to the hosted git instead of pushing around the binaries itself -- though I am speculating since I've not used it myself just read about it online.
[1] https://git-lfs.com/
-
Ask HN: How do you keep your documentation, how-to, examples and blogs updated?
Specifics depend on project types, but literate programming[0] and using/enforcing coding/git/versioning standards helps. re: outdated responses -- email list for 'new/updated version available' with errata/change log location.
[0] : https://blog.bitsrc.io/literate-programming-a-radical-approa...
[1] : https://blog.codacy.com/coding-standards
[2] : https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/blob/main/.github/workflo...
-
Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?
fine with layers: e.g., large binary files via git-lfs (https://git-lfs.com) and merge conflicts in non-textual files by custom merge resolvers like Unity’s (https://flashg.github.io/GitMerge-for-Unity/).
Perhaps in the future, almost everyone will keep using Git at the core, but have so many layers to make it more intuitive and provide better merges, that what they’re using barely resembles Git at all. This flexibility and the fact that nearly everything is designed for Git and integrates with Git, are why I doubt it’s ever going away.
Some alternatives for thought:
- pijul (https://pijul.org), a completely different VCS which allegedly has better merges/rebases. In beta, but I rarely hear about it nowadays and have heard more bad than good. I don’t think we can implement this alternate rebases in Git, but maybe we don’t need to; even after reading the website, I don’t understand why pijul’s merges are better, and in particular I can’t think of a concrete example nor does pijul provide one.
- Unison (https://www.unison-lang.org). This isn’t a VCS, but a language with a radical approach to code representation: instead of code being text stored in files, code is ASTs referenced by hash and stored in essentially a database. Among other advantages, the main one is that you can rename symbols and they will automatically propagate to dependencies, because the symbols are referenced by their hash instead of their name. I believe this automatic renaming will be common in the future, whether it’s implemented by a layer on top of Git or alternate code representation like Unison (to be clear, Unison’s codebases are designed to work with Git, and the Unison project itself is stored in Git repos).
- SVN, the other widespread VCS. Google or ask ChatGPT “Git vs SVN” and you’ll get answers like this (https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/svn-vs-git/, https://stackoverflow.com/a/875). Basically, SVN is easier to understand and handles large files better, Git is decentralized and more popular. But what about the differences which can’t be resolved by layers, like lazygit for intuition and git-lfs for large files? It seems to me like even companies with centralized private repositories use Git, meaning Git will probably win in the long term, but I don’t work at those companies so I don’t really know.
- Mercurial and Fossil, the other widespread VCSs. It seems these are more similar to Git and the main differences are in the low-level implementation (https://stackoverflow.com/a/892688, https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki#....). It actually seems like most people prefer Mercurial and Fossil over Git and would use them if they had the same popularity, or at least if they had Git’s popularity and Git had Mercury or Fossil’s. But again, these VCSs are so similar that with layers, you can probably create a Git experience which has their advantages and almost copies their UI.
- We Put Half a Million Files in One Git Repository, Here's What We Learned (2022)
-
Show HN: Gogit – Just enough Git (in Go) to push itself to GitHub
> I don’t know what that is
its a standard output from `go doc`, rendered as HTML. if you dont recognize that, then you aren't really in a position to be commenting on the topic. nothing is stopping anyone from pinning to a tag:
https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/tags
or even a commit and relying of a specific version of the software. yes upgrades might be painful but a module IS available.
-
Unable to push because of large file deleted in the past
# git push origin feature-branch /usr/bin/gh auth git-credential get: 1: /usr/bin/gh auth git-credential get: /usr/bin/gh: not found /usr/bin/gh auth git-credential store: 1: /usr/bin/gh auth git-credential store: /usr/bin/gh: not found Enumerating objects: 9228, done. Counting objects: 100% (7495/7495), done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads Compressing objects: 100% (2090/2090), done. Writing objects: 100% (6033/6033), 72.77 MiB | 7.39 MiB/s, done. Total 6033 (delta 4402), reused 5194 (delta 3616) remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (4402/4402), completed with 477 local objects. remote: error: Trace: c1c90b47a5483929dcdd8c974a6c7d0695e86f67f680d8b88b80ef1c1bce74a remote: error: See https://gh.io/lfs for more information. remote: error: File deployment_20200220.sql is 872.78 MB; this exceeds GitHub's file size limit of 100.00 MB remote: error: GH001: Large files detected. You may want to try Git Large File Storage - https://git-lfs.github.com. To https://github.com/my-org/my-project.git ! [remote rejected] rest-logging -> rest-logging (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/my-org/my-project.git'
- What and Why, Git LFS?
What are some alternatives?
rclone - "rsync for cloud storage" - Google Drive, S3, Dropbox, Backblaze B2, One Drive, Swift, Hubic, Wasabi, Google Cloud Storage, Yandex Files
git-fat - Simple way to handle fat files without committing them to git, supports synchronization using rsync
onedriver - A native Linux filesystem for Microsoft OneDrive
Gitea - Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
paperless-ngx - A community-supported supercharged version of paperless: scan, index and archive all your physical documents
git - A fork of Git containing Windows-specific patches.
maestral - Open-source Dropbox client for macOS and Linux
nixpkgs - Nix Packages collection & NixOS
cyberduck - Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for Mac and Windows.
scalar - Scalar: A set of tools and extensions for Git to allow very large monorepos to run on Git without a virtualization layer
Jellyfin - The Free Software Media System
Bazel - a fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system