onedev
v
Our great sponsors
onedev | v | |
---|---|---|
81 | 219 | |
12,698 | 35,248 | |
2.5% | 0.1% | |
9.6 | 9.9 | |
6 days ago | 2 days ago | |
Java | V | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
onedev
-
Cicada – A FOSS, Cross-Platform Version of GitHub Actions and Gitlab CI
I'm going to plug https://onedev.io/ its awesome. Its self hosted and has its own tooling for CI/CD. I feel it doesn't get enough love, but I've been using it for years for my own stuff.
- Harness launches Gitness, an open-source GitHub competitor
- Ask HN: Gitlab or Gitea for self-hosting Git?
-
My Ten-Year DevOps Product Welcomed Its First Commercial Customer
I started to develop OneDev (https://onedev.io) since 2013 as an open source project in my spare time. To sustain long-term development of the project, an enterprise edition was released last month, and today it welcomed the first commercial customer. Not a very successful project from monetization point of view, but I enjoyed all the trips developing and maintaining it.
- Revolt: FOSS Discord Alternative
-
What self-hosted Git server ?
An option I don't see often brought up but I use it myself and love it is https://github.com/theonedev/onedev. It has its own CICD implementation along with a visual interface to configure the tasks. The developers are very responsive when issues are reported, and it has a very good code search engine with symbol recognition.
-
Self-hosted Alternatived to ClickUp?
https://leantime.io/ And https://onedev.io/ (if you want ci/cd as well)
-
GitHub Projects alternatives
OneDev supports projects.
- Gitea, Forgejo, or OneDev
- Selfhosted solutions for developers are bullshit?
v
-
V Language Review (2023)
Their site is clearly showing the language is in beta. The V documentation also states that autofree is WIP, and to use the GC instead. This isn't a corporate created language, but looks to be a true volunteer open source effort from people around the world.
Their community, in comparison to others, even has their discussions open and open threads for criticism[1]. These
-
Towards memory safety with ownership checks for C
V also has this https://github.com/vlang/v/blob/master/doc/docs.md#embed_fil...
- Vlang Release v0.4.4
- Vox: Upcoming open-source browser engine in V
- Building a web blog in V & SQLite
- bultin_write_buf_to_fd_should_use_c_write
- The V Machine Learning Roadmap and Ecosystem
-
Show HN: A new stdlib for Golang focusing on platform native support
Goroutines was the selling point for me until they decided to introduce telemetry in their toolchain; that was what forced me to stop using Golang as a whole.
About GC, I would say: if you implement C++'s RAII mechanism to replace garbage collection, then I believe this project will have a bright future.
My final question is the following: how `pcz` compares to V language, from a syntax's perspective [1]?
- Hopefully, the V developers will establish a relationship with Microsoft.
-
The V Programming Language 0.4
V has the right to exist, have its supporters, and do things its own way. The creator and developers of V, from what I have seen, has always responded well to constructive criticism. Their language has discussions opened at their GitHub, unlike those for various other languages. They even have a thread for what people don't like and want improved about the language[1], again, something many other languages don't have.
A lot of what was going on initially, was coming from obvious competitors, to include being uncivil, inflammatory, and insulting. The initial "criticism" was not so much that, but false accusations of the language being a scam, vaporware, fraud, or didn't really exist. To include attacks and jealousy about its funding and having supporters. This was not any kind of "valid" criticism, that the creator or contributors of the language could reason about.
The "criticism" never died down, but rather after V was open-sourced and established itself on GitHub. The initial series of false accusations could not stand nor could the support it was getting be stopped. So, the rhetoric and targets shifted to whatever could be found to go after on the newly released alpha version of the language and its new website. In that new mix of what was being thrown at it, there were indeed some very valid criticisms, as can be found with any new language.
Constructive and valid criticism, is not the same as insults, trolling, misinformation, rivalry, or false accusations. There is clearly a difference. It's disingenuous to pretend something from one group is the same as the other, or that the intent behind what is being done is not different.
What are some alternatives?
Gitea - Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
gitlab
go - The Go programming language
Jenkins - Jenkins automation server
Odin - Odin Programming Language
woodpecker - Woodpecker is a simple yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility.
Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
gitlab-runner
sokol - minimal cross-platform standalone C headers
drone - Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/gitness]
hn-search - Hacker News Search