Laminar
woodpecker
Our great sponsors
Laminar | woodpecker | |
---|---|---|
10 | 54 | |
287 | 3,651 | |
- | 3.7% | |
4.0 | 9.9 | |
22 days ago | 5 days ago | |
C++ | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Laminar
-
Phabricator replacement? | Or OpenProject alternative? | issue tracking/code
*Laminar - I like how simple this is
-
Gitea 1.16.1 released
I use Laminar CI for this: https://laminar.ohwg.net/
-
Log4j2 nightmares for self hosters?
Delve into Laminar would be my suggestion.
-
Self-hosted CI/CD options?
I like Laminar as a lightweight, self-hosted CI solution.
-
What CI tool should I go with?
For a lightweight solution, I like to recommend Laminar CI.
-
what is Lightweight, self hosted CICD in 2021 ?
Laminar
-
Gitlab CI server alternative that is more FOSS
Laminar is a lightweight and modular CI system licensed under GPLv3. I like that it allows me to build the CI solution that fits my given use case the best.
-
Looking for a classical non-hosted CI platform that works and is not Jenkins
I find Laminar quite interesting in this space. It might help you too to build your own lightweight CI solution that does exactly what your use case requires.
-
Can selfhost help me to be an architect/devops?
My continuous integration / continuous deployoment system is based on Laminar CI (blog post series). It serves various purposes:
-
Project: Laminar! A cross-platform, open-source, plugin-based automation framework. Easy to write c# plugins can implement functionality that's exposed through a visual scripting interface
jftr: There is another project with this name which is deceptively similar, but also very different… (quoting the README): Laminar is a lightweight and modular Continuous Integration service for Linux. It is self-hosted and developer-friendly, eschewing a configuration UI in favour of simple version-controllable configuration files and scripts.
woodpecker
- The worst thing about Jenkins is that it works
-
Examples of Woodpecker (CI/CD) pipelines for .NET
Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.
-
regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers
Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker
-
GitHub: “Human eyes” will never see the contents of your private repositories
> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline
I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/
Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/
I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...
- Woodpecker CI: simple, extensible CI engine powered by Docker
-
What self-hosted Git server ?
https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io
-
GitHub actions top alternatives
https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/
-
Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].
I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].
-
JSON vs XML
The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/
- Woodpecker
What are some alternatives?
Concourse - Concourse is a container-based continuous thing-doer written in Go.
drone - Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/gitness]
Jenkins - Jenkins automation server
Factor.io - Factor Server runs your continuous deployment workflows
gitlab-runner
github-act-runner - act as self-hosted runner
Jenkins - A static site for the Jenkins automation server
PHPCI - PHPCI is a free and open source continuous integration tool specifically designed for PHP.
onedev - Git Server with CI/CD, Kanban, and Packages. Seamless integration. Unparalleled experience.