Laminar VS CDS

Compare Laminar vs CDS and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Laminar CDS
10 1
287 4,432
- 0.9%
4.0 9.5
21 days ago 1 day ago
C++ Go
GNU General Public License v3.0 only BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Laminar

Posts with mentions or reviews of Laminar. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-02.

CDS

Posts with mentions or reviews of CDS. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-02.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Laminar and CDS you can also consider the following projects:

Concourse - Concourse is a container-based continuous thing-doer written in Go.

drone - Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/gitness]

Jenkins - A static site for the Jenkins automation server

Factor.io - Factor Server runs your continuous deployment workflows

Jenkins - Jenkins automation server

gotestfmt - go test output for humans

overalls - :jeans:Multi-Package go project coverprofile for tools like goveralls

GitlabCi

gomason - A tool for testing, building, signing, and publishing binaries.