ocaml
rescript-compiler
Our great sponsors
ocaml | rescript-compiler | |
---|---|---|
118 | 93 | |
5,127 | 6,411 | |
2.0% | 1.2% | |
9.9 | 9.5 | |
4 days ago | 4 days ago | |
OCaml | OCaml | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ocaml
-
The Return of the Frame Pointers
You probably already know, but with OCaml 5 the only way to get flamegraphs working is to either:
* use framepointers [1]
* use LBR (but LBR has a limited depth, and may not work on on all CPUs, I'm assuming due to bugs in perf)
* implement some deep changes in how perf works to handle the 2 stacks in OCaml (I don't even know if this would be possible), or write/adapt some eBPF code to do it
OCaml 5 has a separate stack for OCaml code and C code, and although GDB can link them based on DWARF info, perf DWARF call-graphs cannot (https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/12563#issuecomment-193...)
If you need more evidence to keep it enabled in future releases, you can use OCaml 5 as an example (unfortunately there aren't many OCaml applications, so that may not carry too much weight on its own).
[1]: I haven't actually realised that Fedora39 has already enabled FP by default, nice! (I still do most of my day-to-day profiling on an ~CentOS 7 system with 'perf --call-graph dwarf', I was aware that there was a discussion to enable FP by default, but haven't noticed it has actually been done already)
-
Top Paying Programming Technologies 2024
11. OCaml - $91,026
-
OCaml: a Rust developer's first impressions
> But .mli files do not help with the "no types in the source code" problém
It partially helps since it forces you to have types where they matters most: interfaces.
> And I did not experience any advantage of separate signature files so far,
100kLoc is already quite big! I'm starting to think I'm an outlier since a lot of people don't see the benefits :)
For me, it helps because I really don't want to see the implementation when I use an API. If I need to look at the implementation, it means the interface isn't well specified. All I need should be in the interface: types, docs, (abstract) types. And no more.
Typically, an .ml file will have more than what is exported, types won't be abstract but will have a concrete implementation, and type signatures may be missing. How would it feels like to use list if only https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/stdlib/list.ml was available, instead of https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/stdlib/list.mli?
Haskell tells you what is exported from a module, but it only shows you the names. To see the signatures, you need to rely on generated doc.
Arguably, since OCaml has includes, it suffers from the same problem, your ".mli" may have tons of include and it becomes harder to see what's exported without an external tool
> It partially helps since it forces you to have types where they matters most: exported functions
But the problém the OP has is not knowing the types when reading the source (in the .ml file).
> How would it feels like to use list if only https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/stdlib/list.ml was available,
If the signature where in the source file (which you can do in OCaml too), there would be no problem - which is what all the other (for some definition of "other") languages except C and C++ (even Fortran) do.
No, really, I can't see a single advantage of separate .mli files at all. The real problém is that the documentation is often worse too, as the .mli is autogenerated and documented afterwards - and now changes made later in the sources need to be documented in the mli too, so anything that doesn't change the type often gets lost. The same happens in C and C++ with header files.
-
Bringing more sweetness to ruby with sorbet types 🍦
If you have been in the Ruby community for the past couple of years, it's possible that you're not a super fan of types or that this concept never passed through your mind, and that's totally cool. I myself love the dynamic and meta-programming nature of Ruby, and honestly, by the time of this article's writing, we aren't on the level of OCaml for type checking and inference, but still, there are a couple of nice things that types with sorbet bring to the table:
-
What is gained and lost with 63-bit integers? (2014)
Looks like there have been proposals to eliminate use of 3 operand lea in OCaml code (not accepted sadly):
-
What can Category Theory do?
Haskell and Agda are probably the most obvious examples. Ocaml too, but it is much older, so its type system is not as categorical. There is also Idris, which is not as well-known but is very cool.
- Playing Atari Games in OCaml
-
Bloat
That does sound problematic, but without the code it is hard to tell what is the issue. Typically, compiling a 6kLoc file like https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/typing/typecore.ml takes 0.8 s on my machine.
rescript-compiler
-
Learning Elm by porting a medium-sized web front end from React (2019)
If you’re a front-end developer, you should checkout ReScript[1], supposedly a JS-oriented successor of ReasonML and developed by the ReasonML team.
-
ReScript: Rust like features for JavaScript
ReScript is "Fast, Simple, Fully Typed JavaScript from the Future". What that means is that ReScript has a lightning fast compiler, an easy to learn JS like syntax, strong static types, with amazing features like pattern matching and variant types. Until 2020 it was called "BuckleScript" and is closely related to ReasonML.
-
Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
As another commenter has already suggested, ReasonML has a lot of what you described here.
However, modern JS-oriented toolchain for ReasonML is called ReScript and you can learn more here: https://rescript-lang.org/
-
How does one write React apps in a purely functional style without making the entire codebase a mess?
ReScript (before BuckleScript) https://rescript-lang.org/ is a functional language that can also use OOP. Ideal for Javascript and Typescript projects, React and servers. It integrates perfectly with Javascript and Typescript code https://rescript-lang.org/docs/react/latest/introduction
-
Show HN: EdgeDB Cloud and 4.0 with FTS and Auth
Thank you!
We invited Gabriel because we think what he's building is pretty cool. It showcases so much about EdgeDB: its type system, data model, query language, composability, introspection, etc.
I'm not a ReScript user myself. What I know is that it's a functional programming language somewhat heavily inspired by OCaml. Their website goes into details [1]
-
Strong typing, a hill I'm willing to die on
You might want to look into ReScript (https://rescript-lang.org/). It has strong static typing with type inference, and it is very fast.
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
This is because a “Tagged Union”, another word for TypeScript’s Discriminated Union, is a way to “tag which one is in use right now… we check the tag to see”. Just like when you’re shopping and check the tag of a piece of clothing to see what the price is, what size it is, or what material it’s made out of. Languages like ReScript compile many of their Unions (called Variants) to JavaScript Objects that have a tag property.
-
Converting a JavaScript React app to a ReScript React app.
ReScript is "Fast, Simple, Fully Typed JavaScript from the Future". Let's take a look at how we can add it to an existing React project.
-
Way to High Confidence: The Ideal Testing Trophy
REscript
-
Domain Modelling in the Cloud & AWS CDK
Ultimately, Dhall wasn’t verbose enough nor was I Dhall ninja, but something like TypeScript or ReScript probably would have been better.
What are some alternatives?
svelte-wasm
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.
TypeScript - TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
Fable: F# |> BABEL - F# to JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Rust and Dart Compiler
purescript - A strongly-typed language that compiles to JavaScript
reason - Simple, fast & type safe code that leverages the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems
openapi-generator - OpenAPI Generator allows generation of API client libraries (SDK generation), server stubs, documentation and configuration automatically given an OpenAPI Spec (v2, v3)
Alpaca-API - The Alpaca API is a developer interface for trading operations and market data reception through the Alpaca platform.
melange - A mixture of tooling combined to produce JavaScript from OCaml & Reason
VisualFSharp - The F# compiler, F# core library, F# language service, and F# tooling integration for Visual Studio
dune - A composable build system for OCaml.
tsdx - Zero-config CLI for TypeScript package development