oasis VS Ceedling

Compare oasis vs Ceedling and see what are their differences.

oasis

a small statically-linked linux system (by oasislinux)

Ceedling

Ruby-based unit testing and build system for C projects (by ThrowTheSwitch)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
oasis Ceedling
26 3
2,701 557
1.9% 1.6%
8.8 3.3
8 days ago 4 days ago
Roff Ruby
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

oasis

Posts with mentions or reviews of oasis. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-26.

Ceedling

Posts with mentions or reviews of Ceedling. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-15.
  • Looking for a GitHub repo which contains unit tests
    9 projects | /r/embedded | 15 Jan 2023
    Unfortunately, our codebase (at work) isn't on a public github account. But I can really recommend throwtheswitch.org.
  • Bare Metal Embedded C++ (14/17) Unit Testing?
    3 projects | /r/cpp | 15 Dec 2022
    throwtheswitch.org tools are pretty interesting. They focus on C, but support C++ as well.
  • “Static Linking Considered Harmful” Considered Harmful
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Oct 2021
    This is very situational, but I have recently been part of a project that does a lot of C server-side development and we have found that static linking our non-glibc dependencies has really improved our developer experience. Using ceedling's dependency plugin[1] and producing a single "statically" linked library has made our C development much closer to using a language with a more modern package manager. Don't get me wrong, if I was trying to distribute binaries to machines I didn't control I'd definitely be willing to invest in the Linux packaging "fun", but for a server-side application it's been a good choice for our team overall.

    [1] https://github.com/ThrowTheSwitch/Ceedling/tree/master/plugi...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing oasis and Ceedling you can also consider the following projects:

iglunix - Linux (and other kernels) distro with no GNU components

go - The Go programming language

glaucus - A simple and lightweight Linux® distribution based on musl libc and toybox

panda - code powering the comma.ai panda

muslrust - Docker environment for building musl based static linux rust binaries

CMock - CMock - Mock/stub generator for C

kiss - KISS Linux - Package Manager

test

Sourcetrail - Sourcetrail - free and open-source interactive source explorer

interrupt - A community for embedded software makers.

browservice - Browservice: Browse the modern web on historical browsers

house2