lighthouse VS astro

Sure.

1. SQLC is little more than a template generator for Prepared Statements wrapped in a class. [https://www.php.net/manual/en/mysqli.quickstart.prepared-sta...]. It's not exactly a mind bending or time saving tool.

2. There are multiple OpenAPI generators for PHP, in fact, they existed from nearly the start of the OpenAPI protocol (formerly Swagger) when Go was barely a year old. Here's a current popular one: https://openapi-generator.tech/docs/generators/php/]

3. PHP also, (unsurprisingly given the origination point of the spec) has many GraphQL implementations that support any database driver over ODBC, key-value stores, or even flat files. Here's one that plugs into Laravel [https://lighthouse-php.com/]

4. PHP has many mature, modern embedded KV store options... but it's also had one in the standard lib since years before Go even existed, or the concept of KV stores was even popular. [https://www.php.net/manual/en/class.splobjectstorage.php].

On your non-numbered points...

Go and PHP are fairly similar in raw processing speed since the JIT was added to PHP. However raw number crunching is rarely realistic when most applications are going to be using databases, stores, etc. So why not look at a benchmark of popular frameworks in both languages - which shows, again that the two are fairly similar in performance. [https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r21&l=z...]

PHP has also had types for about 4 years now. It's not statically typed, but that's a preference, not a pro/con situation.

Built-in formatting is also a preference, not a pro/con situation. Many developers strongly dislike languages like Go and Python for this.

PHP has had one of the most powerful and useful package management ecosystems in the entire open source world since composer mostly replaced PEAR nearly a decade ago. It also has mature and well loved testing tooling. Neither of which are built in, because why would you need to build in tools that the community already creates and maintains for free?

I don't know what "bugs" you faced in the PHP stdlib, but I will concede that it is painful to use. Most of the stdlib is little more than a wrapper around C functions of the same name, and they inherit the frustration of using those C functions.

Laravel does allow you to write things by hand. You can also just define them ahead of time and have the Migrations, Models, Controllers, Views, Transformers and more generated for you automatically. [https://blueprint.laravelshift.com/]

There you go, there's your links. But frankly, you didn't need them. There's little you mentioned that's unique to Go at all, you just named a bunch of things that have become popular tools for most modern languages still being actively developed. I'm not sure why you think any of these things are Go-specific - some of them are maintained by the Go core team, like other newer languages have started doing, but that's it.

I am starting a new Laravel project with Lighthouse and have been problems with resolving non root fields. According to the documentation here for each of the fields that have complex types, there should be a model and a query provided for the field. So in this example I have a Version object which has two subfields: appVersion and apiVersion. Here is what I have in my schema.graphql file: ``` type Query { version: Version }

Those are the two main differences between GQL and REST. I can't tell you if it is suitable for your project, but now I hope you can make an informed decision. Also, for the idea that "GraphQL feels more aligned with creating a backend in Node," that's just BS. GraphQL is not aligned with any particular language, and the official project page lists various implementations. For Laravel specifically, you may want to look at the Lighthouse project.

It may be beyond the scope of what you’re willing to do at this point, but I would consider switching to a GraphQL API. Gives your frontend a lot of flexibility in what data is requested with a lot less code dedicated to resources and controllers. Check out the lighthouse-php package if you’re feeling a bit adventurous.

Lighthouse is a good option too: https://lighthouse-php.com/

For multi-user apps Laravel Sanctum, Lighthouse for Laravel are options worth considering, haven't them tested yet.

The most popular GraphQL libraries for Laravel are Rebing & Lighthouse, in our tutorial we will be using Rebing which we can install by running:

if you have no problem with php, take a look at Laravel with this package

A third way you could take is GraphQL, which is designed for querying and selecting things at arbitrary depths. Lighthouse looks to be a very nice graphql server for Laravel, from what I've used of it anyway. Pull up a graphql tutorial (the one on graphql.org is pretty good) and give Lighthouse a spin.

Astro is the new hot new web framework on the block. All the cool kids are using it. I've recently given up, drank the Kool-Aid, and gone all in on it.

Built with Supabase, Astro, Unreal Speech, Stable Diffusion, Replicate, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Astro to use every framework at once instead of just react? https://astro.build/

Depending on the stack of the repository you are cloning, you might have to install additional dependencies. For this demo, I'm using my own website, which is a static website built with Astro.js. It which requires to have Node.js installed and Yarn for package manager.

Database: turso [7] or neon postgres [8] with (drizzle orm) or cloudflare durable objects

1. https://github.com/withastro/astro

Maybe a bit too elaborate for your taste, but I've used https://astro.build/ and loved every bit of it.

Astro is an open-source JavaScript framework known for its versatility, performance, and new approach to web development. It enables developers to create fast, modern, content-rich web applications and sites using the "Bring Your Own Framework" (BYOF) model.

Astro was always on my list of things to learn. I've been using Remix and NextJS for a while, and I was interested in trying out a new framework. I decided it would be a good opportunity to build the site with it. This decision turned out to be a great one, as it saved me a lot of money on hosting costs later on.

We are continuing to make building fullstack websites and application with Analog and Angular as seamless as possible, and extending the Angular ecosystem through integrations with Astro, Nx, [Vitest]https://analogjs.org/docs/features/testing/vitest, Storybook, and more.

import { defineDb, defineTable, column } from 'astro:db'; const Visits = defineTable({ columns: { id: column.number({ primaryKey: true }), page: column.text({ default: 'home' }), content: column.text({ default: "none" }), pagination: column.number({ default: 1 }), visitor_ip_hash: column.text(), visitor_user_agent_hash: column.text(), visitor_count: column.number({ default: 1 }) } }); // https://astro.build/db/config export default defineDb({ tables: { Visits } });