nunjucks VS dayjs

In ApostropheCMS, templates are where code and content become web pages. Specifically, templates are written in normal HTML markup with special tags and are based on the Nunjucks template language. Thus, they are .html files placed in the /views subfolder of an ApostropheCMS module.

This starter Kit has been created by Corllete in partnership with Apostrophe. From a technical point of view, the ecommerce project is based on several UI components. Each of them relies entirely on Tailwind CSS for styling, with no additional CSS files. These components are organized in macros and fragments coming from the default server-side template engine Nunjucks.

So there's Nunjucks, a frontend templating language inspired by jinja2, which itself is based on the Django template language. You could try that, and mock in data from JSON when required until you're ready to use real Django.

The linked one is my Rails implementation, written for ViewComponent. The official version uses Nunjucks.

The template engine is Nunjucks.

Take a look on Nunjucks a templating language by Mozilla . You can use Gulp to start with it, check gulp-nunjucks-render.

Try out Nunjucks https://mozilla.github.io/nunjucks/ . It does exactly what you want.

As web developers, we heavily rely OSS packages. One popular example is Day.js, a JS lib for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates. It's a widely-used alternative to Moment, with over 17mil weekly downloads on npm.

A critical bug was discovered in Day.js (see: https://github.com/iamkun/dayjs/pull/2118) causing incorrect date manipulation (add, subtract) when in UTC TZ. This could have severe implications for any project relying on Day.js for date-related functionality. However, the maintainer of the project appears to be unresponsive, leaving the bug unresolved and the future of the library uncertain.

This raises some important questions for our community:

- At what point should we consider a widely-used OSS project "abandoned" if the maintainer is unresponsive?

- Is forking the project the best solution, or should we first try to reach out to the maintainer through other channels?

- Are there established community guidelines around responsiveness expectations for widely-used OSS projects?

- What are successful examples of community-driven forks or maintenance after a maintainer stepped away?

I am very aware that many of these developers give their spare time for free for these projects, with little or no payment, and I am very thankful for all their work. This developer does get some money (a small amount?) through OpenCollective, and possibly also works for a company (in China?) that makes a UI library, which I think uses Day.js internally.

11. DayJs

DayJS has issues with its timezone plugin not compatible with Hermes engine https://github.com/iamkun/dayjs/issues/1942

Date.js

We have to install refine's support packages for React Table and React Hook Form. We are using Tailwind Heroicons for our icons, the Day.js library for time calculations and Recharts library to plot our charts for KPI data. So, run the following and we are good to go:

DayJS is a lightweight and fast JavaScript library for manipulating dates and times. It offers a moment.js-like API but with a much smaller footprint.

I use Day.js in my projects.

well, I haven't reviewed the code, I just checked package.json and I'll suggest you to ditch moment.js Even the creator recommends ditching it. dayjs is a fantastic alternative.