npm-run-all VS TypeGraphQL

Now, the tsconfig.vitest.json seems to be the most "complete" (it will check app files as well as test files), so it's a good choice if you really had to choose one config and run with it (and you still get type checking in the IDE for each config). But, this doesn't include the files from tsconfig.config.json, and as an app grows, the "app" and "vitest" configs may diverge, so wouldn't it be best to use something like concurrently or npm-run-all to run vue-tsc against all 3 configs?

Finally with help of the run-s cli command we create a build script that runs the command sequentially. So run-s build:* will first run remix build followed by build:css script.

Or, if you don't have bash (Windows for example) you could use a package like Concurrently or NPM-Run-All.

Install the npm-run-all package (if not present)

We can run all these scripts in parallel by using npm-run-all

dev uses npm-run-all to run both commands at the same time, so you don't have to have two terminals open.

Used npm-run-all to enable to run commands for the front-end and back-end at once.

npm-run-all

In this tutorial, we're building a simple application which uses Cerbos inside of a GraphQL server. The server is written in typescript and uses type-graphql to create the schema and resolvers, and TypeDI to handle dependency injection.

Using decorators required setting an --experimentalDecorators experimental compiler flag. Several popular TypeScript libraries, such as type-graphql and inversify, rely on this implementation.

TypeGraphQL

Have you tried TypeGraphQL v2 (it's in beta). Some in this thread have reported success with it.

When moving away from Apollo Server, and you're looking for a replacement built with JavaScript or TypeScript, let me give you some options. If you want to keep building your GraphQL API schema first, you might want to consider Mercurius (which relies on Fastify) or GraphQL Yoga. If you're going to build your GraphQL API code or resolver first, have a look at TypeGraphQL or Nexus. Alternatively, there are great GraphQL-as-a-Service solutions such as StepZen in case you no longer want to build, maintain and host your own GraphQL API.

There are two main approaches to keeping the types of the GraphQL schema and entities in business logic in sync. You can generate the schema based on your TypeScript code (e.g. TypeGraphQL), or you can generate types based on your schema (e.g. GraphQL Code Generator). We opted for the latter since it slotted right into our existing GraphQL server implementation using Apollo Server.

I've used tools (e.g. TypeGraphQL) in the past, and for smaller schemas I've just manually written the schema.

I'll be honest and say I don't think python is the right language to implement graphql. It's possible of course and if you're looking for a graphene tutorial, I'm sure you can find one (and I'll help you evaluate one, if you'd like). I'd personally go with node.js, typescript, and typegraphql.

Foal's dependencies have been updated so as to support the latest version of TypeGraphQL.